G-THEORY thesis CH 13

  THE EOS AND THE GOD PARTICLE

  • FORCE AND 'ENERGY'-------------------------------------------------------579

Note: The following provides simplified examination of subjects which are given thorough analysis elsewhere in the thesis. These are likely to not be self explanatory.

 

The term eos is actually derived from 'executive forceos' which is a bit of a mouthful, so eos it is. It is usually referred to as 'the vacuum' in traditional theory.

This explanation is in all likelihood going to complicate matters more than necessary for the presentation of the theory as a whole, but I feel there is a definite need to clarify the following to avoid the obvious logical dilemmas which will otherwise be encountered and of course fired back with unerring precision.

Several definitions must be clarified first.

1/ Weak nuclear force: This is the elastic force contained within a single nucleon (proton or neutron) which holds the nucleon together. It is currently thought to be the primary function of quarks. EWF is related but not expanded upon here.

2/ Nucleon or atomic binding 'energy', or in G-theory it becomes strong nuclear binding force (SBF): This is the force which holds nucleons together in an atomic nucleus, often against some coulombic repulsion. This is absolutely part of the role of quarks, but in this case  -among other particles- by the mediation of the mesons by utilization of bosons called gluons that operate via biracial force interactions.

3/ Extreme near-field force: This is any force which only acts within a nucleon and does not transfer anything beyond its borders.

4/Near-field force finishes at or near the boundary of the outermost electron shell (probably including the Fermi layer at least up to the conductance band). In some cases and for some forces it extends slightly beyond the valence band as electronegativity/positivity.

 Strong nuclear force is an extreme near-field force probably acting under fourth power law (or greater) of attraction over decreasing distance. The electroweak binding force is also an extreme near-field force. Sub-quark and some bosonic forces are severely extreme (not in value but in decreased field of effectiveness) near-field forces.

5/Far-field force extends well beyond an atom. Combined atomic (electron) extreme far-field forces is theorized herein to extend from a body far into space.

6/ Sub-quantum: Force quantum numbers measured in integer sub steps that are fully relative to sub-particle quanta. Trions should be regarded as the lowest level quanta in that one trion equals one sub-sub-quantum. Quantum integer numbers reference with electrons and gravitons, photons and ramatons and they also apply to all fermions.

7/ Bosons: Sub-particles of quarks and other greater quantum particles: There may be three or more decreasing orders of particle states down to trions which can all be enjoined to make up higher order fundamental bosons and greater. These supposedly lowest tier particles (trions) would most likely be particles that (if virtual reality was a viable concept) could perhaps be evaluated as virtual particles of pure cosmean biracial force but in that stae they are constituted as matter. Dpes this mean that matter is made out of something virtual? Probably!

The characteristics of all the particles translate to notionally static and instantaneous forces which are bi-racial charge, magnetism and binding force (strong and weak) and quark tri-color charge which must be a cosmean phenomenon because no such charge arrangement exists in the greater cosmo-universe. Although not necessarily interactive, these extend to higher order charges etc.

The interaction of the forces presented by the particles in opposition to any other force that attempts to change their relative positions with each other results in the phenomenon called 'mass'.

Now these sub-sub particles would be contributive to bosons of greater size, some of which are; charge boson or particle, magneton boson or particle and the atomic binding force boson (gluon) or particle, all being able to be combined to constitute the graviton, photon and other higher generation particles. Again; the generated sub-particles are quark, neutrino and gluon respectively which with the addition of W and Z bosons can make up quantum particles. This will be analyzed further. It isn't necessary to address anti matter states for this assertation.

It is likely that neutrinos in their various flavors are primarily responsible for the dimensional translations that are required in G-theory.

Be that as it may: The known bosons maintain force/'energy' parity when confined in a nucleon or a graviton, photon or ramaton etc. They do not necessarily attract or repel each other, they exist in a probable equilibrium co aligned with the precepts of the 'zeroeth law of thermodynamics'. They only attract or repel bosons in other nucleons by the tri-active inelastic near-field force effects of quarks.

I have in my possession, diagrams that demonstrate boson combinations that show the reason why both non-magnetized and magnetized AMOs are able to still maintain the strong and weak forces in both cases. I also have models of neutrinos of every type which show how readily muon/electron neutrinos can conjoin with another to form a tau neutrino etc*, and that neutrinos as well as most fundamental sub particles actually do have a probably undetectable and miniscule P mass.

*Of course the size of the neutrino doesn't change but it now has greater perturbative interaction with gravitons and its vibrational amplitude will change (and some scientist will give it another moniker such as tau etc). This means that neutrinos must exhibit a small and seemingly insignificant amount of G-mass as P-mass. However significance is relative.

 

 Bosons, especially gluons and even electron orbitals all combine to hold atoms together. It is likely that strong magnetization is able to change physical characteristics of a material to a certain extent. It is theorized that static magnetism in materials can only be maintained within the window of eos operational parameters.

This same model shows how a magnetic line of force can cause magnetic dipoles to rotate and shift spatially within nucleons (polarize) by eigenvector shifts with eigenvalues only relatable to g and form factors, and all the while maintaining  nucleon and nuclear bonds. This was a necessary precondition for the explanation of electrical generation by magnetism in a preceding chapter. Note: An MRI exploits that g factor resonance effect.

The three sub-sub-tiers of matter (in combining) constituted the first particle of matter, not by magic but by pertinent translation to the dimensions in which we observe matter to exist. Matter is therefore not manifested because of the existence of smaller and smaller particles of 'solid' stuff. It is caused in all of its manifestations by the inter-working of forces between all of the dimensions as the case may be. Note: It is of extreme importance for the gravitational theory herein that it can be concluded that the eos (via the agency of gravitons) attempts to maintain the 'matter' content of all objects within nucleonic constructs including all AMOs!

Bosons must not be referenced or equated to have characteristic of matter that we observe on the larger scale. They are not heavy, hard or soft, brittle or plastic, hot or cold. The only characteristics of matter that they possess are that they occupy space, and they can move and exert force and transfer 'energy' by motion. This includes photons and gravitons.

Magnetic poles and charge poles (signs) don't actually exist. We name them and give them their attributes only to make sense of the observations that we see*. Sub-particles move and operate in and dimensionally parallel to the eos in the manner determined by its laws. So any idea of the actual existence of monopoles as magnetically active particles is absurd but they may be recognized as objectively existing as sub magnetic particles for the sake of quantum explanations.

*Charges may actually be spatially averaged and physically lopsided combinations of lower fundamental biracial charge interaction resultants. Astrophysicists will be happy to note that CPT is therefore often violated at the sub fundamental levels because biracial charge law is not in accordance with coulombic law, which is just a higher order reflection of the base fundamental non-spherical charge points. This is most notably observed when the mass of a neutrino is compared to the mass of an anti-neutrino which is enigmatically recognized as being greater.

 

At temperatures above and below the 'operating range' of the eos strange things occur, many of which are explained within the pages of this thesis. By their respective actions and with the introduction of elasticity and velocity/vibration, bosons contain an attribute called 'divergence' force. I will now explain.

The eos oversees all of the dimensions listed in chapter one from dimension five to twelve . It conditionally transmits force sub particles to wherever they are required for their application, to provide the necessary equilibrium balance of force which translates to 'energy' by such motion.

The eos 'measures' both the overall 'temperature' and 'gravity pulse' of the universe and of individual atoms. Apart from charge parity, it is also 'responsible' for keeping objects separated or bound. This all occurs instantaneously in the sub quantum world of the cosmea, because unlike some particles, in this case the sub-particles appear to have no effective or intrinsic 'mass'. I will give an example.

When a photon is emitted by an atom to a tine, the eos instantaneously transfers (from the quark lattice) force sub-particles (bosons) and velocity 'c' to it, which as we should by now understand is related to a particular and long lived 'energy' state requirement of the universe through divergence.

Extra force sub-particles residing within a quark lattice do NOT add to the 'mass' or directly to the density of any object*. They are given and taken at will by the eos which is not subject to any universal law because it is causative of those laws. The photon is also held together on its tine by the eos which is controlling the photos: TBE.

*There may be noticeable expansion or contraction in objects but this is caused by changes in atomic vibration amplitude by electron behavior (which also causes measurable temperature changes) and not by extra mass. Pressure is the measure of the kinetic force of such atomic amplitude increase acting against the AIR (not air) of any containment vessel.

 

When two photons collide, (pass 'via' each other) they do so by fleetingly shifting dimensions. When this occurs, 'energy' is transferred from the photon to form a graviton/s. The eos confers a velocity 'y' to the graviton which is also subject to divergence evaluation. The graviton in the gravitos dimension now has 'energy' and divergence force, and a god particle is born.

During normal non-plasmic photonic 'collisions' the photons maintain contact with the brane as well as separation from other photons (by the agency of the eos during this process) and they are then dimensionally constrained to continue along the same tine upon cessation of the event. This would be considered to occur instantaneously.

However 'instantaneous' still only allows an unknown yet limited quantity of 'three dimensional' photons to be able to occupy the same continuum point on the brane. Instantaneous action does mean that a traveling photon will not undergo any change in velocity by these events, and it remains concluded that they don't, until evidence to the contrary is forthcoming.

There is an obvious objection to be answered: I.e. "If photon-photon interaction mechanics were to cause gravity then we would expect to see the majority of the gravity being emanated by stars and in our case the sun and that is definitely not the case so your theory is highly implausible and it must be rejectd outright on those grounds."

Yeah I would too. However that line of reasoning is not taking into account the phenomenon of the featured photon-graviton reabsorbtion phenomenology which occurs in a similar and statistically equal manner. So in places where the light 'flux' is omnipresent then the gravity flux will remain stable.

Only in the vicinity of a star (sun) would we notice an increase in gravity. This is expected to be only a marginal increase in the notional direction of the resultant emitted light streaming from the star. Such a gravitational anomaly will soon be ironed out to steady state because of the statistics of the proposed interaction mechanics.

So here on earth we do notice anomalous gravitational affects which are often unrealized but which not only emanate from the sun but also from the light in the solar system space around it as well. This makes the gravity in the solar system stronger overall while not being significantly observable as emanating from the sun itself.

Rather than fobbing this theory of in an unscientific manner, wouldn't it serve science better to analyse such a mechanism for gravitational stabilization over reasonably expected distances with the tools at your disposal. All I have is my own conceptualizing which seems to be able to just get a 'feel' for the likely results from such statistical mechanics.

Such a 'feel' could be frightening for someone with another agenda. Oh yes folks don't think that agendas don't feature strongly in the scientific peer review consensus seeking process. Remember what I said about the lunatics running the asylum. Also consider that lunatics don't actually realize the fact of their own mental state but perhaps ironically it was Einstein himself who said that to keep doing the same things over and over again while expecting a different result is the definition of insanity.

Tell me: What are they vainly continuing to do but to chase down the same unification and seeds of auto-creation in the same impossible ways? You decide. Maybe it's not that they're insane under the strict definition of the word but many appear to be driven to arrive at some particularly required and very necessary outcome that doesn't really involve science. I wonder what that could be? God knows!


 

 

 

 

FORCE AND 'ENERGY':

 

ASSERTATION

 

 

"Every action has an equal and opposite reaction". So goes the famous law of motion. However unwritten within that law is another part which is accounted for in the resulting motions and that is energy loss. The loss is diversely separated into parts which either remain within the objects involved or are emitted to the close environment or the distant environment. This results in a slight local energy violation but (because that has been taken into account) not of the local stress energy or momentum energy. Even virtual forces entertain losses within the objects involved.

Apart from virtual forces (including inertial force which derives from any action which upsets any state of momentum), two of the most unusual forces which almost seem to create 'energy' from nothing, are friction and impulse. They are actually two forms of the same thing and they can trade places.

 A graviton has the force/'energy' content of the smallest photon boson. Two or more quantum photons (quanta stream packet of 'graviton sub-quantum sum' force particles) give up gravitons by collision with parity considerations and in so doing they also lose a proportion of vibrational kinetic 'energy'. This forms a graviton/s by consequence, and the force interaction then converts to notional 'energy' by the emission of the graviton which is contained as vibrational divergence force within the graviton.

In the graviton collision situation; the mean motion relative change related 'energy' which is released by the force of graviton-graviton 'transitional friction' (or almost perfect elastic rebound) will eventually be re-converted back to photons or photon quanta within another nucleon or photon stream. In their lowest possible intermediate state the gravitons are reduced to the static force sub-particle components until sufficiently high 'energy' levels (meaning addition of sufficient extra sub particles) possibly allow recombination of the sub-particles back into a graviton, or otherwise they will (multi-dimensional conditions permitting) be scavenged by the eos. A graviton is subjectively able to potentially become a dimensionally shifted sub-quantum ingredient of 'tri-color charge' weak force or a basic quark. This would be more likely to actually be a psuedo-quark baryon in the newly formed universe.

We have finally declared the basic mechanics through which graviton transitions cause the affects of gravity and G mass by transitioning through any specific fully formed 'unity cosmea/gravitos construct' within nucleons (which is currently known as a quark lattice) within which there must ever only be ONE cosmean boson-femtospace* ('femto black hole' boson repository) per nucleon existing in collusion with the gravitos or else 'energy' loss or gain in a nucleon would otherwise result in a change in effective mass. This is an exclusion principle which may be related at the nucleon level to the PEP which would then by definition be an observation of electron behavior relatable to nucleon activity. Note: This ohm's law relationship with PEP 'will be/has been' explored further.

*This predicates that there is a femto black hole inside every nucleon labeled 'cosmean femtospace'. Why a nucleon only ever contains one quark lattice with one intrinsic cosmean femtospace is unclear. It could possibly have to do with either biracial repulsion/attraction or color charge parity considerations. However any conception of two black holes of any description existing side by side appears to be ludicrous. Note: this are not black holes similar to the cosmic black holes. These are holes in the vacuum. The femto-spaces operate under g-statistics whereby the require a constant sp of particular graviton perturbable/ive particles (likely sea gluons) which remains down to zero K.

My personal opinion is that such exclusivity derives from the G-theory postulation that universal neutrons originated from cosmean praetoms and of course protons are derived from neutrons. If there is no other reason then there is nothing to prevent nucleon-synthesis that results in nucleons with any imaginable number of quark lattices and any imaginable number of particles in the femtospace and quarks that roam outside the nucleus because there appears to be nothing stopping that but they don't; and there is a reason from a later chapter.

This could be a case where one exclusion principle is derived from a lower fundamental exclusion principle. I will call that the Bonney exclusion principle.  This exclusion is unrelated to temperature or pressure of any description and the femptospace size in constant. That is G-statistics in a nutshell.

 

With respect to light absorption: A photon being received into a nucleus is disposed of in any manner and as soon as possible, either as a last resort by instantaneous quark lattice assimilation* which would be thought to be preempted by re-emission, BBR, or convection. The latter being a sharing of gravitons or sub-particles with its neighbors in a similar or multi-dimensional manner. This behaviour is conditional to various restraints and allowances under multiplex quantum law. This is a future subject.

*In the current paradigm this would be instantaneous motion in a quark lattice: If you think about that, such a concept requires the lattice to actually have no size in the 'universe' sense, and all the particles within it must occupy the same space time. Only G-theory fully allows such a phenomenon to legally occur. Other previously postulated time disjuncts we have analyzed and proven to be implausible.

Other multiplex theories have provided for several dimensions of time to coexist, which in a complex universe becomes very problematical indeed. However the parallel existence of multiple euclidian dimensions while appearing irrational to subjective evaluation does not do damage to logic . Note: All theories actually appear to be outlandish to the human senses but from an empirical stance; logic is king.

 

Any consequential rise in temperature caused by this event will also signal the eos to act in any legally determined manner in order to keep force/matter balance requirements in check. Because of exclusion principles and other reasons so stated, the eos (outside of the surface atom's quark lattice cannot always act as instantaneously as it would like, and time relative temperature differences and large scale conservation violations (resulting in the second law of entropy) with regard to matter throughout the universe, is the normal result.

If the eos didn't exist at all, it is hard to imagine how the zeroeth law of thermodynamics is capable of even having any real mechanism of causality whereby its predicates are able to be obeyed. Even so the predicates are time delayed and not applicable over such vast distances as noted. In such a case it could be imagined that generalized average temperature differences of billions of degrees would be expected because of the 'slow' finite speed of light. Note: It is thought that both the gravitos and the photos are connected in a triune dimensional arrangement wherever they exist as required. I.e The framework is always existing in an unknowable sense.

This is why, (apart from some limited eos driven instantaneous BBR transfer) it is postulated that gravity traveling at stupendous speeds is the main contender for being the very immediate agency for cosmological 'energy' transfer and balance and it is the eos that sets its velocity. This is also why gravity anomalies can be observed in the universe. These variations are often called gravity waves. They are not the cause of gravity but are simply a barely observable effect of GD variations in close to real time. Note: The gravity waves theorized as waves similar to those of fluid dynamics phenomenology are not to be seen to be either gravity waves proper, or as any indication that actual gravity waves exist in a way that proposes any wave propagation mechanism for gravity. Problematical for such a speculative idea: Where is the propagation medium?

The vibrational frequency/amplitude of lower generational 'massless' particles has nothing to do with spatial momentum at all, and they can be postulated to possess wave particle duality but only in a subjective mathematical sense. I do not see any hope for fluid dynamics type wave function being able to explain the operations of these particles because of the multi-dimensionality and subsequent ability for them to conditionally occupy the same space at the same time. In such a case a graviton would likely be the same physical size as the particles it consists of, which is why we can still consider it to be a boson regardless of its quantum value (which is rarely if ever full). In this case uncertainty principle is invalid because we know exactly where the sub particles are regardless of their movements if we know were the graviton is.

The vibrational velocity (spin) moment of a particle in space is a slightly time delayed indictor of the 'energy' requirements of the universe with local variance. In the case of gravitons it is an indicator of the 'frictional' force sub particle reserve capacity contained within them. The reserve capacity of the transferable 'energy' content of a photon and other 'energy' stream packets is indicated in both their vibrational amplitude and frequency but not their velocity*. The latter remains CONSTANT regardless of the 'energy' state of the photon bosons etc.

*Notional 'energy' of their velocity is circulated multi-dimensionally by the eos.

 

A graviton however can be considered to possess a negative divergence velocity force functor, whereas a photon is seen as possessing an omni-divergence vibrational force functor. This just means that a graviton can lose velocity but not wave function (spin 2) during nucleon transitions whereas a photon can only lose vibrational amplitude. This is all regardless of particle content (quantum) value.

This places gravitons existing in the gravitos under something like B-E statistics and it allows gravitons to collide with each other and rebound under conditions of almost perfect elasticity, possibly with only slight and insignificant eigenvalue transformation of wave function* but their energies are not reduced. This suggests however the strong likelihood that gravitons operate under the predicates of an unknown statistical regime (that I have dubbed 'gravitos or G-statistics') and they have limited spin (spin 2 is actually limited) or vibrational 'energy'; mainly a notional Ek of velocity.

*This allows for a slight background temperature in deep space because by mutual graviton activity trions will be released as BBR because of the 'nothings perfect law' or the 'It's not yet clear' dictum. By similar reasoning we can be assured that some will also find their way into the photos and be assimilated by photons. It could well be that by a reverse process to their production mechanics; colliding gravitons might actually emit a BBR-trion or gluon into the photos by mistake. This is not a phenomenon worthy of much attention at the moment but light scintillations from space are real. I jus' don' like loose ends. Da boss wan'sta see me!

 

Except for gravitons, the concept of force in all other bosons such as photons and ramatons also includes strong force (gluon), magnetons and neutrino bosons. The action of force by gravitons is by bi-divergence duality with velocity. I.e. If they could be spatially motionless relative to each other they could exert no PIR force or elicit any 'mass'.

All of the bosons therefore (including photon bosons) appear to have a 'form' of momentum even though they are currently thought to be massless. This 'stable velocity' is simply a function of the eos but I intend to show that all particles have 'mass' even though they may not posses it all the time! What the..?

I will explain later how the eos confers velocities and injects force sub-particles into these greater particles on a more or less instantaneous and continuing basis in response to the 'pulse' of the universe and local and motion generated inertial GTD as well as overall GD 'readings'. This doesn't instantaneously balance divergence but it is simply a general charge balance mechanism by (in some cases) the cmf conditionally acting instantaneously (over a dimension which has the impedance in space of zero) and possibly by the agency of a cosmean brane.

This universal instantaneous particle transportation ability is caused by the same cosmean phenomenon as that which exists within the inelastic quark lattice which is in operation inside nucleons. (TBE)

Remember at the very beginning when I said that the eos was thwarted in its attempt to send all universal matter back to the cosmean state? Well it is still being thwarted because any attempt made by the eos to send any BBR particle off to the cosmea is not likely to see it travel more than a femtometer or so without running into a photon or graviton etc which is in a state capable of absorbing the sub-boson particle. Note: This is likely to be what happens to the 'guts' of quarks upon electron annihilation.

From hereon in and for purposes of comprehensibility I will limit the inclusion of any sub generational particles below the level of gravitons, photons and ramatons in the following address. It is sufficient to understand where force and 'mass' comes from, because it cannot be left to the assumption that it comes from nowhere!* Note: In the real world all force fields are just sympathetically vibrational when not propagating and it must be remembered that nothing can occur without the operation of a force.

*Dare I suggest that all force began with a notion? After all, it is profoundly obvious that you yourself actively affect the 'energy' state of the universe by simply 'deciding' to move, and then acting on that decision and so causing compounding forces to be activated! Is that a universe type 'butterfly effect' or what? In actual fact the descision came from active forces in your brain which used energy. What actuated those forces? Mmmm!

 

Now this one sided discourse could leave you perplexed, especially if you have reasonable reached the conclusion that I appear to be alluding to the eos as possessing intelligence. On the contrary: The eos is simply the cosmean dimension of order in stillness. It has been awakened by the creation of the universe and all of its seemingly calculated behavior is simply itself vainly continuing its attempt to obey the first law of the cosmea. I.e. 'Repair me; this instant!' Like all the laws of the universe they must be obeyed. This is not a matter of 'personalizing' or some sort of 'legalistic morality'; such laws are detectable only by the observed or legitimately proposed actions as intransigent absolutes.

The eos is trying to obey its legal requirement instantaneously but 'real time' is complicating matters by stretching the instant. Of course the eos in concert with the cosmea has no inkling of time or results so it blithely does what it does as an action of cosmean legality. In fact (by way of further personification), this makes it appear to be quite stupid. Such an opinion may be further justified when it is seen to be working against itself by attempting to pull the cosmea back together in two conflicting and self-defeating ways. However according to the cosmean generated behavior which results in our recognition of the laws of thermodynamics, it will always default towards giving up 'energy' when matching parity in any system and it will only allow a gaining of any 'energy' by the action of an overriding force.

Why then don't we analyze what the eos actually does? First and foremost the eos is responsible for the operation of the fundamental and basic forces (especially in the quark lattice) as well as the velocities of particles by the same statistics. We should note here that the graviton-quark lattice relationship is only perturbative because of the eos-gravitos dimensional strangeness. N.B. The dimension of the eos existing in the greater cosmo-universe (space) has no interconnectivity to quark lattices within nucleons in any AMOs only the cosmea/gravitos cooperation has.

1/ Binding forces; being both strong and weak nuclear forces: These forces which hold atoms together, are the outworking in the universe of the overall cosmean force which is in instantaneous yet continuing operation.  This all occurs in the attempt to pull the cosmean rent back together by cosmean law. The actual law is the law of biracial attraction which has nothing to do with the eos in any immediate sense.

The sub-particles of these forces, I.e. gluons, magnetons and neutrinos have 'strength' variability, but will not move spatially or dimensionally without being affected by the required sub-quantum number of force value. At ground state near zero k they will also not move until another similar although sufficiently strong particle is able to take their place to ensure the structural and matter value integrity of the larger quantum particle they reside in, and are hence affecting.

In a different sense; any quantum particle may contain a quantity of force bosons greater than one quantum integer step, but except for BBR only an integer step value sub-particle (quantum) and above, may be released from the atomic construct in any case. I.e. being describable as a quantum integer photon or sub-particle/sub-integer quantity as BBR.

If a photon value of 'quanta matter' leaves the nucleon it will be  conditionally replaced by the eos either instantaneously because of the zeroeth law of thermodynamics, or (if in the bowels of an AMO) by nucleon transfer at 'c' within the several constraints now realized. In any case as soon as possible depending on the internal atomic statistics. In some cases the photon is re-emitted immediately regardless of parity concerns which become conditionally abrogated.

 This means that a lone atom in deepest space will not fully attain to absolute zero. It is likely to remain a few degrees above because the pertinent laws of thermodynamics and the law which is causing the eos to attempt to return atoms to BST, come into conflict with each other in the final assessment as well as G-statistics. This is because even if a BBR particle was going to take a million light years to intersect an atom, the eos maintains a continuously (instantaneous) 'vigil' to prevent the atom from losing all its matter to the now pulsating coldness of space caused by intermittent BBR particle or photon collisions. It will prevent further emissions. Note: The femtospace will remain intact although the effects of gravity may be truncated because of a breakdown in the EWF chain.

 The intermittency may be at a much higher frequency than that example but it is still there. This goes for all lone atoms. The coldness of space without particle collision or transition would be zero k, because there can be no radiation or any sort of transmission or reception of 'energy' without the agency particle propagation as 'energy', and if not for the eos, in time the atom would empty itself of all 'energy' to arrive at parity with its surroundings. This means that the (zeroeth law) ceases to apply below a certain extremely low temperature because at zero k there would be no matter left. It would take an infinite amount of time for absolute zero to be reached. That's impossibility. The energy input from gravitons on a lone nucleon is insignificant. Note: There is such a thing as near field and restricted far field force but there is NO SUCH THING as an 'energy' wave by any envisaged emr or otherwise.

It may seem that I am conferring intelligence upon the eos again, and your immediate question would likely be. Why doesn't the eos then keep all accessible atoms at a higher or even (BST) temperature? The answer is that the eos is only keeping the atom above absolute zero by default only because it carries out charge balance in the universe (mostly by BBR) and by so doing it prevents the atom from reaching a zero charge which requires it to maintain sufficient bosons and quarks to keep it just above zero k. Note: If you want to find real intelligence out there, I would suggest that you look beyond and above all of this!

The charge balance I am referring to is biracial charge and this balance is being carried out by the eos by the attempted instantaneous movement (or restriction of movement) of sub-bosons in both space and emission from surface atoms* within its universal, zeroeth law and temperature limited theatre of operation. Weird huh? But please don't rush to judgment just yet.

*At close to absolute zero all atoms would become separated and find themselves subject to the laws of the cosmea/eos alone.

 

In the case of gravitons; BBR may be absorbed by a graviton traveling inwards towards the center of the universe, or surprisingly with an almost equal chance for one traveling outwards. In this manner the charge is balanced over time by the agency of gravitons etc and this also goes a long way to balancing GD in the universe and helping maintain equilibrium.

Whatever amount of time this is supposing, it is obviously far less than the eons that would otherwise be required for the universe to keep its charge and temperature balance maintained, if at all. If this didn't occur we could then have the case that such a biracial 'voltage' could build up because of matter-anti-matter imbalance that a 'gamma burst like' lightening bolt might say jump from our galaxy to some other nearby galaxy with devastating consequences for life on earth to say the least.

This may seem to be a superfluous postulation. However without this explanation, there would have been a serious flaw in the theory. How about yours?

Having finished with all of this it becomes conclusive that the gluon/s is responsible for the strong binding force within nucleons but with conditions which have previously been explained, and the weak forces are caused by the sub-particle bosons themselves. A quark will remain above absolute zero by always maintaining at least one graviton value of force/matter which will NEVER have presence in the gravitos and so it only has a perturbative relationship with transiting gravitons by cross brane sub-particle sharing. The containment by a quark of varying quantities of more than one sub-quantum is noted in some theories as color charge differences. This does not change the graviton perturbative force whatsoever. By consequence temperature has zero to insignificant affect on G mass. That's a known fact.

Because of BBR (which is enforced by the eos in concert with the zeroeth law) the graviton content of all AMOs at STP remains constant on average over time, and this is proportional to temperature, so long as that's within the effective temperature range of the eos. This is possibly because only one transitionally returnable graviton is legally able to occupy any nucleon at any one time. This concludes that for all exactitude, any exactly equal AMO existing at any different temperature will exhibit the same gravity, mass and motion relative inertia as the other. Note: This latter statement is not precisely correct and it will be shown in a later chapter that by two particular and different empirical reasons relating to comparisons between both extremely small and larger objects; that as well as shape, size does matter!

2/ Magnetic force. This force is often taken for granted as requiring no explanation. However I postulate that it is one of the basic bonding and motion causing forces of the cosmo-universe. People often wonder about what causes a magnet to be. G-man's initial and seemingly trite, simplistic answer is: The same thing that causes an object of any description to be. I.e. it originated from the cosmea.

In G theory, the particles of magnetic force shall be noted to be magneton bosons activated by neutrino sub-bosons.

3/ Electrostatic charge force. Ditto…sub-particles are neutrinos.

4/ Separation force. Now this is a force which is not often recognized. This is a force that keeps universal matter apart until it tends toward a high or low temperature in which case it is deemed to be moving from the universal 'goldilocks' separation state towards the cosmean state as the case may be, and the eos loses (relinquishes?) control of it and amalgamation may occur even at temperatures which seem to be less than the melting point.

5/ The cmf and gmf. These are cosmean forces, and are determined by the eos in response to the overall 'state of the union'. These provide velocity to gravitons and quantum stream packets of all descriptions.

6/ Gravitational force. This force is as explained in preceding chapters and the velocity of propagation of the force is again controlled by the eos automatic divergence process, and this is subject to cosmo/universal laws.

While sufficient divergent 'energy' remains in the universe, the eos will continue to exhibit seemingly self defeating behavior. On the one hand it utilizes divergence force to cause BBR as well as other 'energy' quantum state emission, and on the other it is attempting to give heat 'energy' back to atoms via the gravitos, and because 'energy' enters via gravitons and leaves by particle steams; at the current rate, we have a tentative equilibrium. (The word 'energy' is most often used for descriptions where specific force actions are not a necessary criteria for the explanation of motion relative change, but 'energy' otherwise can simply mean heat). In any case it always refers to resultant particle transfer of some description which is always the result of a force. In fact external force is able to replace the internal energy of a system and keep the system at the same temperature! Energy has been lost and not replaced by particles? No not at all because the external force must be provided by the motion of particles. There is no other force. Note: In this case magnetism must operate via particles of some description. Questions still remain!

The eos however, only has a narrow window of operation because of a couple of reasons. 1/ loss of power (capability). 2/ loss of independence (authority).

1/ The loss of power has occurred because of the introduction or creation of time and by consequence distance. Its power is also abrogated within AMO's (inside nucleons) and by extension, universal bodies.

2/ The loss of independence is caused by it's effects being able to be overcome by local forces. Some examples are: Bonding 'energy' can be overcome by temperature gain or loss. E.g. burning. Magnetism can be overcome by the same. Separation force can be overcome by temperature. E.g. melting and combining. Electrical charge and other forces can be overcome by local far-field charges and emf's. For a good example just drop a spanner on the terminals of a car battery and note what happens!* The gmf and emf are also able to be overcome by changes in universal divergent 'energy'.

*Don't do that at home. I'm a professional!

 

So now we can understand that the eos (though playing a crucial role in the operation of the whole universe) is not intelligent and it is similarly not omnipotent. In fact the eos is subject to the first pre-fundamental dimensions. Yes; and surprisingly and ironically the unsung heroes of the saga are the first four dimensions which are commonly called space-time. Apart from the eos all the other proposed dimensions are subject to them, and fragmentally the cosmea.

In the cosmea, all these other dimensions had no idea that space-time even existed, because the cosmea was not required to 'do' anything. In that pre universe the other fundamental dimensions and forces 'acted' statically and did nothing at all 'instantaneously' in order to keep the rest, or ground state as previously described. This occurred without motion because of the true equilibrium at ground state. Note: No force; no mass or motion.

Now herein lays a conundrum or two which must be addressed.

1/ if the eos is outside of the chronos and acts instantaneously with force, then shouldn't all of its actions throughout history be deemed to be occurring at the same instant as well?

2/ shouldn't the cosmea then be declared to be of indeterminable or infinite size?

The answer to both questions is; "that the questions and answers are all relative and there is no possible answer that will satisfy the subjective conclusion of all possible observers".

However we should perhaps take notice of the fact that the eos is performing an almost infinite number of time delineated yet instantaneous actions of varying duration throughout the brief history of time. Sorry, I couldn't help myself! To explain further: The actions of the eos may operate with instantaneous rise and fall times yet over a non instantaneous duration because of constraints within matter and because of time and distance throughout the cosmo-universe in general, as well as other conditionally abrogative affects of other dimensional laws.

At night, when all the world's asleep, the questions run too deep, for such a simple man… Supertramp

Is there anybody out there? --- Roger Waters… Pink Floyd