neuvophysics.com



INTRODUCING THE MULTIPLEX* G-THEORY

            *The vacuum hybridization of space.

 

 

  • THE PARAMETERS AND LAWS OF THE DIMENSIONS
  • THE OVERWHELMING LAWS OF THE UNIVERSES
  • AN ANALYSIS OF THE MULTIPLEX  DIMENSIONS
  • THE MULTIPLEX TENSORS

 

G-theory proposes a (non-esoteric/metaphysical) dualistic cosmogony of multi-dimensionalism (multiplicity).

 

ABSTRACT:

 

This presentation includes a provision of the characteristics and laws of the dimensions. ('Dimension' is not always the meaning of the word as a measurement of physical displacement).

In that context within the Euclidian 'three dimensional' universe, the third dimension of depth/height brings the first two physical dimensions to life. In this theory other incremental abstracts are used which by themselves are deemed not to exist. (Incremental-ization and digitization are common tools in scientific description). Lines such as waves and other shapes are infinitely assumable but it must be deemed that they do not actually exist and are useful only as tools for analysis and explanation.

Common theorizing of strings and extra bosons and of non existent particles such as tachyons may seem somewhat similar to the theorizing of particles entertained by this theory.  The difference is that the particles and dimensions theorized herein are deemed to not only substantively exist as scalars but to be subject to the existing and rigid scientific laws of their own dimension. They are either also able to be measured or their effects are measurable/observable in the universe and they have no metaphysical or paranormal connotations. I.e. it is only infinitesimal size or physical characteristics and not dimensional status that may confer invisibility (non observability by any direct means) upon objects of matter existing in any dimension. Note: The cosmea would almost seem to be a parallel universe; however this is not probable because its effects are seen in the universe in many dimensions and in all likelihood cosmean matter also exists in the universe; hence I often use the combining term; ' cosmo-universe' . Atoms and all universal matter are therefore subject to laws pertaining to the cosmo-universe.

As is usually the case; particles are theorized herein for reasons of necessity. Behind every proposed theory there needs to be a rationale that lays out the necessity for the presentation of the theoretical elements so put forth. So at this point I will present the rationale behind the idea of multiplicity and explain the derivatives.

 

 

 

ASSERTATION:

 

It has been found to be necessary when studying sub particle interactions, both in and outside nucleons, that many of the bosons must be capable of occupying the same space time. Whether permanently or fleetingly, it makes little difference--- the problem is still the same--- because this is in conflict with the relevant law of the four dimensional universe which prevents any object from occupying the same space-time.

We will now analyze some theoretical concepts of phenomena that appear to be able to allow or indeed enable this to occur with fully obvious universal legality.

The first and most obvious solution is to jump to the conclusion that sub particles (bosons) have no size and are therefore virtual or fictitious particles, which by extrapolation to the greater universe means that matter itself, if it consists of these particles, (a prime contention of G-theory) is also virtual and doesn't actually exist.

This idea contains an immediate problem for both physics per se and by extension the classical physics based G-theory because it allows the idea of 'meta-physicalism' to creep in, wherein there can be now no known mechanics which is able to keep biracial particles apart.

However as far as contemporary physics is concerned the greater problem becomes obvious in that this puts an empirical physics, that contends for the actual existence of matter, into spiritual and/or metaphysical realms. So this idea must be rejected as a possibility.

The essential realization of the necessity for a mechanism of particle avoidance has of course led to other postulations, one of which is the idea that some bosons are able to become time disjuncted in some 'magical' way such that upon colliding they can be 'seen' to temporarily inhabit different time 'zones'. If this were to occur it would require that either one or both bosons must disappear from our own relative gaze, but then we are faced with a different dilemma of; where (oops I mean when) did they disappear to?

Apart from magic; which was thought hopefully possible by the introduction of the Coleman-Mandula theorem but which became disappointingly disallowed in the current quantum paradigm by the extended Haag-Lopuszanski-Sohnius theorem, we must then ask the question: What could possibly have caused or at least enabled the -apparently time disjuncted- disappearance? As well as that we must consider the fact that at least one particle must instantly reappear in some other time or dimension wherein it may or may not have an actual collision, and/or at least a perturbative influence on the original or new time or dimension upon either time re-entry or disjunction respectively.

Some postulated ways of solving such a problem are to for one envisage the further requirement for the preemptive time disjuncted transmission of data in order to allow interlocution to occur. Either that or envisage time disjuncts that are greater than the age of the universe such that the particles are able to be time disjuncted to a time when nothing else supposedly exists. This would also require an innumerable number of space/time 'pigeon holes' that would need to be able to accept or deny access to incoming particles which would all have to be controlled by some sort of 'super duper computer'. This is all just utter nonsense that I have engaged in simply to show the futility of going down that path.

There is no possibility for the current batch of theoretical models including supersymmetry to allow internal quantum symmetries to interact with Poincare space-time symmetries.  There has to be a more logical and rational solution. You've probably guessed what solution I mean by now!

If the time disjunctive dimensions are indeed to be non perturbative/able at the very least (where; upon deep consideration it must be concluded to be impossible), then we are constrained to conclude that bosons are restricted to the idea of dimensional disjunction and NOT SPACE-TIME DISJUNCTION, or otherwise please explain how they are able to communicate their existence or not by interlocution through such a non perturbative barrier as time in order for both the disjunct and/or the return to be made to the original dimension without the risk of simultaneous reappearance at the same space-time occupancy position as some other already existing particle. Note: Some form of disjunction is necessary for even β-ve decay to occur. This is analyzed in another section.

If you are in any way enamored by the idea of time travel, even for particles then I suggest you are studying the wrong book. By way of an answer derived from multiplicity (MP) theory; there are two conclusions which are able to be logically presented at this point. The first is that it doesn't really matter which dimension the boson remains in, but this remains problematical in consideration of the actual disjunct even if they aren't required to return.

The second is that the bosons remain 'entangled' and transfer limited data to each other regarding size and velocity which enables them to time the transition and reappear back in their original dimension after a calculated 'instant'. Upon further reflection this then seems to require that another data communication dimension must also exist. This is not necessarily so because they exist in the same space-time multi-dimensionally and are able to interlocute by force perturbation across the brane and in that manner prevent or limit any attempted coexistence (collision). I will expand on this.

In considering both the time disjunct and the MP proposals we should ask: What then can prevent a boson from jumping through a non perturbative time barrier to another time or dimension and reappearing right at the point of existence of another boson in that other time/dimension? Answer: The avoidance is only able to be by dimension shifts that DO NOT include any time disjuncts whatsoever and the bosons would simply come under instantaneous entanglement to avoid each other by mutual perturbative cross brane virtual force constraints*.

If in the other case; there then remained no interlocutive path to another dimensional disjunct then the bosons would either use repulsive energy to move spatially or destroy each other into other sub-sub-particles perhaps even trions; and in the case of those and possibly other antiparticles, annihilate each other. This probability also then requires that there be laws associated with dimensions. Note: This means that some attempts at cross brane transitions will be botched but any simultaneously attempted space-time positional occupations will only result in a collision at (traditionally) a combined velocity of ' c' with randomized vector distribution. Whether this would result in annihilation of anti particles is unknown and it should be understood that the laws of physic demand imperfection and energy losses so the collision would likely be elastic and any observed annihilation would always take fleeting time.

Without having a full understanding of G-theory you may arrive at the conclusion that particles and energy are the same thing, and by extension--- that mass-energy (M-E) equivalence is conclusive phenomenology. This is only ever conditional: ' Energy ' is indeed transferred by the motion of particles but not all energy. Some energy is not relatable to ' mass ' per se even though it is all relatable to matter as well as forces deriving from matter.

*This would seem to be extremely problematical in situations where particle densities are immense-and-mobile such as in the innards of a star etc. This sort of activity indeed does occur, and a case to point is the limited effect a laser beam has on an intersection with an electron beam. The strange thing about the observational results during such an event is that they show that far fewer particles become involved in collisions than would be expected if there were only two time disjunctive dimensions, whereby one can easily see that half the bosons involved should become engaged at the very least, and that's not what is observed. In that case we would have to either conclude that there are many more time disjuncted dimensions with the same inherent problems of logic multiplied exponentially or we must recognize that there is something else going on here. I.e. by an action which is causing multi-dimensional perturbation through entanglement.

 

The problem with any other theory that predicates a (time, anti-time) dimensional model can be concluded to be only ratify-able by the necessary requirement that there must be an even proportionality between the quantities of bosons in both (or more) time dimensions. Either that or we must consider that one dimension is 'magically' considered to be the real and default dimension and the other/s to not be real. There is no known cause or even a reason for such a preeminent time dimension to exist or even remain preeminent. Also it remains the case that the problems associated with the previous time disjunct theories still apply.

Considering these problems perhaps we should either search for a mechanics worthy of such speculative 'time travel' or constrain ourselves to searching for a better model of quantum mechanics which answers to the following necessary observations whereby we can have some bosons that are able to permanently occupy their own perturbative or non perturbative dimension as the case may be. These are free to roam their own dimension with full appearance of obedience to the normal laws of physics, and appearance is all that's necessary in the final analysis because the laws of physics are derived from observation and nothing more.

In such a dimension whereby these bosons are able to collide and interact with other various particles in the same dimension, (and unless entanglement otherwise requires a dimension shift due to multiplicity law) then it becomes the necessary case that other laws must apply singularly and specifically to individual dimensions.

The post modern term applicable to the determination of such a phenomenon would be the self descriptive label of 'vacuum hybridization'.

 

 

CONCLUSION:

 

There is a requirement for a simultaneity of existence protocol SOE. The main problem with time disjunction SOE is the inherent impossibility for the known phenomenon of entanglement. Alternatively space disjunction SOE via vacuum hybridization still allows perturbability and therefore entanglement. This is because time is event relative while space is not, being instead position (spatially) relative unless we introduce other spaces whereby the time disjunction SOE inter-relationship remains conditionally plausible as an additional and interrelatable phenomenon.

 

 

INTERLUDE:

 

It is a conclusive observance in physics that some bosons do actually collide (often with counter-predicative results), while others 'seem' to pass right through each other. Some also exhibit perturbative affects while others either don't as they would be expected to, or the affect is somehow limited.

In all observations of physics the 'nothing's perfect' rule always applies and anomalies will be noticed; such as the historically logged observation of particles simply appearing from and disappearing to nowhere. This strange also phenomenon as well as weird situation of biracial particles not assimilating as expected every time they come into contact. Many other similarly strange observances have  been made in high energy particle physics experiments.

So in order to 'invent' a better model perhaps we first need to take notice of two observational phenomena.

 

Firstly in the objective analysis of the laser and electron beam interaction (whereby a sub normal level of particle interaction is noticed), we can see that this is much less than the expected result if only two time disjunctive dimensions were to be involved--- and in any case we have already noted the impossibility for any sort of time disjunctive phenomenon to be the case.

 

Secondly we might take into consideration, that with some long lived biracial bosons; trions, W bosons and neutrinos in particular, that there would have to be a rock solid permanence to their time disjunctive dimensions to allow these bosons to occupy a semi perturbative dimensional disjunct for billons of years. This also applies to electrons and more so to muons and like anti hadron relatives.

Just because we live in a universe which is biased towards matter doesn't preclude the existence of some anti hadrons which don't just combine with matter and annihilate. In fact some muons are able to act like anti atoms and such muons are even able to interact with matter hadrons as in a mu-mesic hydrogen atom. Refer to the previous mu-mesic helium experiment reference.

With reference to -muon decay extensions proposed to be relativistic by exhibiting time dilation- This is based on many untested assumptions such as-

 

 1/ that a cosmic ray is really traveling at or approaching 'c'. (In G-theory it is likely to actually be -or be similar too- a proton (or beta neutron or 1H ion?) which would not be traveling at anywhere near the speed of light.

2/that scintillation detector measurements of decay times are meaningful in the real world.

3/ that the energy of impact with atmospheric atoms is the same as that from man made generation and emission of muons.

Main objections:

a/ Muons can be very long lived otherwise how could mu-mesic experiments be able to be carried out? Note should also be taken of the existence of muonium.

b/ Scintillation detections also show that just about everything else including fermions decay at the same rates as the muons!

Conclusion: This is a fortuitously convenient observation that was opportunistically pounced upon with an interpretation thus garnering specious results by evidentiary bias and blatant disregard for assumptive disqualifications.

Particle physics is in many respects a flimsy science which is somewhat akin to looking at a candle (with the sun behind it) through a welding mask and then trying to count the photons that come from the candle. Robust theorizing is probably the only way forward.

If you need further evidence of this muon relativistic 'proof' debacle you can find the original experimental decay findings on...

 

http://faculty.mint.ua.edu/~pleclair/PH255/templates/muon/muon.pdf

 

You should notice that the determinations were a bit like statisticians declaring that, because they got a shot which landed ten yards to the left and another one ten yards to the right that they hit the target. To be fair I'll offer another source which concurs with a decay lifetime of about 2 µS...

 

http://isnap.nd.edu/Lectures/Laboratory/16_Muon_Lifetime.pdf

 

For a 'bo peep' at the relativity-supporting interpretive analysis (assumptions and all) go to...

 

http://thespectrumofriemannium.wordpress.com/2012/10/12/log041-muons-and-relativity/

 

In response I refer you back to objection a/.

 

Returning back to the thread: On the face of it, this probably means we should be engaging in the development of a theoretical construct of permanent yet separate dimensions rather than wasting our time theorizing multiple time disjuncted dimensions, which is being done in some theories which are still attempting to fit in with relativity.

However upon any serious contemplation of such, it must reasonably be concluded that the time disjunctive dimensions are only possible where one is time and the other is non time. Unfortunately  -and apart from the fact that non time is a whimsical beast at best- this whole idea is still fraught with the other problems previously mentioned, so in the piecing together of G-theory it was determined that all of the dimensions must operate by cross brane perturbation but permanently exist within the singular dimension of the chronos save the eos and the cosmea (the latter being essentially non universal, and likely the stuff of black holes) which are not at all related to our time but to the infinite timelessness of the cosmea. I.e. There is only one dimension of time.

In a way Stephen Hawking is right when he says that time stops inside a black hole and that time began at the beginning of the universe. It's just that this wasn't the creation mechanism as he supposes.

The eos (and cosmea) only has a conditional and perturbative virtual force relationship with the other dimensions. If any of these dimensions under evaluation were able to think, they would think they were acting instantaneously. Note: Speculative (caveat applies): The gravitos is the only other dimension where the time may be thought to be 'warped' and it could therefore be this phenomenon which allows the hyper velocity of gravitons by only giving them relativistic appearance of such speed; however the only time dimension we humans and the general cosmo-universe of matter are seen to exist in by reason of the overwhelming relevance of the preceding arguments, is the chronos. Therefore in retrospect such a postulation regarding the gravitos is soundly rejected. We are forced to conclude then that the gravitos is able to support hyper velocity speeds, even though this is in direct defiance of special relativity. NOTE ALSO: Here I hold out the possibility of there being  one or more exclusively and physically/perturbatively disparate relativistic dimensions which is further analyzed thus. 

It should be also noted that within the eos trions are singularly capable of infinite speed in the eos dimension because the eos is a cosmo-universal form of the cosmea and it is still restricted by the introduction of time from intruding into other dimensions at all however the reverse is not the case. This might cause you to conclude that trions actually travel in the cosmea. This is all open to further subjective discussion; however the following presentation should clarify things. That is if such a thing requires clarification at all.

Examples of dimensional shifts and conditions are examined within the following pages. An example of a photon passing right through an electron without any significant perturbability would be by the photon and electron entanglement mechanics whereby the photon moves instantaneously from the perturbative photos dimension into the non-perturbative gravitos dimension where it remains for essentially zero time and it instantaneously returns to the exact position and eigenstate that it was in before the electron had arrived. Yep sounds like magic but show me the physics law that disallows it!

Even though it took a miniscule amount of time for the electron to transit the point of collision, to the photon a zero value of time was taken up in the process so both the electron and the photon seemed to pass right through each other without either of them experiencing any change in their eigen or energy states. I.e. they continued on, velocity and direction unabated. Note: the analysis of this phenomenon in the relevant section is specifically applicable to the photon in strict analysis.

So however If a photon happened to collide with another photon in the gravitos because of the 'nothings perfect' law, a resulting eigenstate change could result, and the observational conclusion would be that the electron beam perturbed the laser beam and visa versa. Other perturbations may be caused by near misses, which would be caused by cross brane perturbative entanglement affects between the sub bosons being carried within the electron and photon. Note: This whole G-theory is interactive, in that any or all phenomenology may not be understandable without the totality of the knowledge. That of course becomes less of a problem as learning progresses.

 

 

THE MULTIPLEX NATURE OF G-THEORY:

 

The vacuum hybridizing dimensions of this SOE theory: (Asterisks are applied to the dimensions already declared to exist under the current paradigm).

The Euclidian dimensions:

1/LENGTH*

2/BREADTH*

3/HEIGHT*

The fourth dimension of time I.e:

4/CHRONOS*

The extra dimensions by G-theory:

5/PHOTOS (not for the family album! Pronounced "foe-toss")

6/GRAVITOS

7/PROPOS

8/MAGNOS

9/FORCE-FIELD (QED) (electro-weak interaction)

10/CHARGE-FIELD (QED) (electroweak interaction)

11/EOS

12/COSMEA: (Not really a dimension of the universe, but one could say of the 'ultraverse' and simultaneously the 'femptoverse'). However the cosmean brane is postulated to transect the cosmo-universe: TBE. Note: COSMOS; is a synonym of universe.

 

13/ANTIMATTER DIMENSION (COSMEAN BRANE): This dimension is required to exist to enable higher order matter and anti matter to occupy the same space time without annihilating each other. In such a case it is typified by biracial gluons (but not neutrinos of both signs) which are often the particles that are exhibiting the existence of various non cosmean branes. This dimension is not considered to be time disjunctive. G-theory postulates the existence of parallel matter anti matter universes* which are both observable as the one we recognize to be our universe of matter. That's probably just a random happenstance because it could have just as easily been the reverse: TBE.

*These are not universes providing alternate realities. They are permanently and intimately combined to form our one cosmo-universe.

 

 

 

Twelve or thirteen dimensions may seem a little daunting at first but it may be comforting to know that as well as the 'founding four' and including number eleven there are usually only one or two others in play for any particular universal activity or causation of atomic properties, and they simply allow the overlap of space at sub atomic levels or enable actions which may otherwise seem 'other-worldly' but which all translate back to the observed properties and behaviour of matter. We actually only notice these extra dimensions within the Euclidian framework. Such extra dimensions facilitate motion, propagation, force to motion--- energy transfer and all properties of matter, and they cannot be singularly observed.

Such vacuum hybridization behavior becomes proportionally restricted by increase in the size and/or complexity of particles and at the level of AMOs it is completely voided.

The dimensions listed after the traditionally recognized founding four, are multiplex dimensions which only have application to quantum states as well as (conditionally) the universal field but not to nucleons and above. These dimensions know nothing of the first four; they are constrained to conform to the original matrix scalar vectors set by the preeminent cosmean matter structure considered to be the framework inherited by fully formed atomic matter.

The lowest fundamental particle (trion) is considered to be formed in the cosmo-universal field by the interrelated junction of three multiplex dimensions, one of which (outside of atomic matter) is always the cosmea or eos. These form the point branes which form the idea of a particle even though if they could think they would think that they were extending across an infinite space but they only appear at the point if necessity as determined by cosmean law which causes the forces and fields to dictate the terms of existence and structure. In this way all such brane junctures are the derivatives of the related notion of sub particles.

However subjective it may be, the cosmean pattern causes structure within particles which extends to nucleons. This is a theory to be fleshed out in the following pages. In G-theory; spinning electrostatic point source particles made of 'who knows what?'  forming magnetic-dipole spin moments is not at all a valid mechanics because there is no known capability in any physics to allow such unempirical phenomenology to even be considered. Note: Refer to the matrix structure of nuclei in a later chapter and the thesis in totality whereby a particle theory relating to both fundamental and nuclear particles is aggressively presented to challenge the metaphysical dogma pervading in the academy regarding such physics disobeying virtual particles possessing no legal causation phenomenology.

The proposed positioning of particles within nucleons is fully in compliance in any observance of nature by the interactions of biracial and electromagnetic force derivatives. These are patterned in accordance with the Q-L---Higg's---SBF spin zero fundamental structure*. This structure disintegrates and annihilates when damaged. This of course takes a great deal of force because the electroweak interaction is even stronger than magnetism.

However this force is able to be overcome in large nuclei resulting in a Higg's annihilation which causes the SBF pion to leave the scene and the SBF becomes dysfunctional at the relevant nucleon bond point and nuclear decay is often the result.

The Higg's boson is only able to exist for long in this construct. Unlike other bosons which can show statistical mass deviations the Higg's will not, because the electroweak force structure is totally consistent although reversible depending on the fundamental charge of the appropriate lattice quark.

The Higg's boson is never regained from anywhere including a postulated Higg's field. Once a nucleon has decayed it will never exist again. This is in spite of some unsubstantiated evidence that W-bosons decay into protons. What was observed would more than likely be some misidentification of another 1+ve particle like a +muon.

While I'm on the subject I will iterate: It will become recognized that antiparticles are not necessarily the mirror twin of themselves. Such anti-self-subjectivism is true for trions, and probably gauge bosons as well. TBE

*This is the answer to the fourth fundamental question posed on the website front page.

 

Spin unless otherwise stated herein is always referring to sub particle vibration (especially not fermion spin) which is considered necessary to provide the energetic state which gives rise to appreciable mass and therefore continence of function. This is not caused by some sort of perpetual motion in violation of the laws of thermodynamics; the spins are continually being reenergized by a process which is empirically legal and forthcoming. Spin also refers to quantum states when analyzing that subject.

 

Universal laws of classical physics are preempted by cosmean laws at the quantum level. This gives legal empiricism to the otherwise exotic and metaphysical nature of quantum mechanics and the standard theory. Multiplicity vacuum hybridization also allows for some apparent symmetry violations as well as orderly conditional space time co-existence. TBE

 

TBE--- to be explained

 

 

neuvophysics.com