neuvophysics.com

 

Notes: Graphical quantum model graphics are not available in this site. A solid understanding of G-theory is a requirement for this study.

 

THE THEORIZED INTRICATE AND DYNAMIC INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF NUCLEONS which extra-forms to the matrix structure of nuclei. Refer to the Matrix structure... tab

 

Now we come to the really weird part where I postulate the roles of dimensions, branes and strings within the nucleon and their connection to the greater universe.

First of all we need to recap on some prior conclusions:

1/ particles below the fermion level are real entities that take up space but they are able to reside either fully or in their biracial parts in one or more spatially diverse dimensions. This means that many will not exhibit mass or a least the correct mass in any given state or temperature. This is what creates one 'head scratcher' for high energy physicists.

2/ many particles are similar to other particles and they are only able to be named according to their particular dimensionally-empowered state. This disqualifies quantum mass predictions of any description -not kinetic energy- and the only signature available for identification is as described. E.g. a neutrino is a trion when in a nucleon as the half and anti-half of a gluon. In another specific dimensional state we call it a W boson*. Neither exhibit any N-mass -which doesn't mean they have no mass- However the trion alone is exempt because it is itself responsible for mass in greater/other particles via the gluon brane separation**. A gluon is also massless because it is similarly responsible for mass by extension. The neutrino has been addressed elsewhere. This leads us to another 'head scratcher'.

*No wonder physicists are so confused. This assertation should clear things up a great deal. It seems that the humble trion is beginning to look like the fundamental particle.

** -but not in any manner similar to the proposed Higg's field.

 

In G-theory I have referred to trans-universe strings as 'tines' to avoid any confusion with relativistic string theories. There are many tines and lesser strings that are deemed to be active within and inter-relation-ally with other nucleons as well as between whole atoms and molecules and this contention will be supported by strong and unassailable evidence.

Tines and strings are Euclidean-sense dimensionless. They have no relationship with time or space. They are able to exist in the same space-time, and the particles so involved ditto. The expansive universe that we see is caused by forces and fields so there can be some conditional perturbation between particles while transiting through or close by to each other in foreign dimensions. Some of these tines go right through nucleons and AMOs while others terminate at the first nucleon they come in contact with.

Branes are the biracial separation point for particles at the point of contact, so internal AMO strings and tines can be considered as spatial but role playing extensions of branes. We alone are subjectively capable of considering them to have euclidean spatial coordinates and orientations. For all intents and purposes a brane on a string could be the exact same position as any other point on the string. The spatial separation is only caused by the interaction of biracial fundamental charges and fields.

To allow for some sense to be made, tines have been given names as required. I.e. photines, gravitines, magnetines, emetines, raotines, ramatines and eotines. Both gravitines and eotines pass right though solid matter including nucleons. Neutrinos travel along eotines, while gravitons travel along gravitines etc. Not all tines are straight in the Euclidean subjective sense.

Inside nucleons there exists a quark lattice which in stark contrast to the elastic and dynamic EWF structures consists of a rigid geometric structure deemed to be based on a flattish much truncated tetrahedral shape which is the necessary form to provide for the required quark positioning as well as the correct angular placement of three offset Q-L to SBF attachment points corresponding to three of the face centered sides of the tetrahedral shaped nucleon matrix filling construct*. This provides for the EWF Higg's centered 'superstruct' connectivity via one of each of the three color charge quark tri-sets being top, charm and bottom. This is able to change dependent upon specific peculiar external force conditions.

*Refer to the Matrix structure... tab.

 

Inside the lattice resides a 'cosmean femtospace' which apart from holding a variable quantity -ranging from none at zero k to an incomprehensible quantity at BST of energy-state sub-bosons- also contains a fixed graviton cell. A string runs from the bottom quark tri-quark cosmea femtospace brane and attaches to the 'Higg's boson Zo biracial brane connection point' where it terminates. A photine string connects to other nucleons in the AMO which can be indicated in crystalline and evenly structured matter. It is from this brane that photons are emitted to other nucleons or to the vacuum via the universe vacuum photine. Such action is triggered by the eos quark lattice to EWF connecting brane at the bottom quark tri-set, or else  if the energy level is incomplete, the eos brane can conditionally emit BBR trions to the 'vacuum'.

This is applicable to the other color quark sets pertaining to magnetines and raotines via the Q-L pion brane and the SPF pion brane respectively. The cosmean string directly connects to the gluon branes in the EWF and they are fully responsible for causing the exhibition of mass in the previously proposed manner via the elastic EWF structure. I have models for all of this in my possession. Note: Here we get to see the finger of God: These nucleon structures were originally praetoms in the pre universe cosmea. They are only able to be annihilated or decay and are never created within the universe, not even from quark gluon plasma.

How it all works might be destined to remain a mystery but I'm sure of this one thing: Nucleons are the engine of the universe and it is the energy return loop between light and gravity which keep the nucleons fueled. It is this relationship which produces the soon to be famous 'LOL' formulas y=c/G and E=y.c. So by calculation the energy in the universe is 9e45J and the evident mass is 9e44kg. It's probably more than that if the 'y' in deep space is even greater than1e27 times 'c'. Note: This appears to be unknowable but G-theory is making great inroads into such understanding. E.g. The N to g mass difference and the affects of gravity on such mass in deep space may allow the calculation of the mass by observations of smaller galaxies relative to close by larger galaxy systems.

The gluon cosmean brane interaction utilizes cosmean force to derive mass so because the conservation of energy must reign then the eos will consequently scavenge trions from the cosmea proper and so some energy as particles -singularly or en masse- is forever returning to the universe but this doesn't undercut the fundamental law of entropy and lost nucleons are gone forever. energy conservation is only a law within the physical universe. Please take note that time disjunctive dimensions are not required in this model which only proposes space time simultaneity.

This brings us to what quarks are proposed to consist of: The model proposes that a 'u' quark is a dimensionally arranged gluon (W-W) and +trion (W). A 'd' quark is then a dimensionally shifted -trion. The 'not' quarks are just the reverse. The color charge quarks have a variable number of helper bosons in residence. The annihilation products should tell that story to some extent.

Helper bosons would dimensionally facilitate the transfer of sub bosons in and out of the femtospace by a 'shift register' process which would occur at 'c' which in such an immeasurable space would be tantamount to instantaneously but from information garnered in collider collisions any speed less than that's just not fast enough to get the job done. The shift register (gauge boson) would be 'manufactured' onsite by the Sp forces modulating from the femtospace itself. Basically the gauge boson 'shift registers itself' in order to form a quantum packet. This is all seen in the higher fundamental solution as force.

The quantum force is determined by the Sp force against the inelastic Q-L. Don't ask me how but it would have to be in collusion with the eos derived parity considerations by the measure of the energy incomings and outgoings as well as string facilitated interlocution between neighboring nucleons first, followed subsequently by atoms second. This is all able to be usurped by external forces either via electron perturbations or  to some extent external physical/virtual forces.

The quarks are joined to each other by gluons and brane-strings relative to the functions of the quark sets. These strings terminate in the gluons such that for example a quark gluon could be adjoined by two branes; say the photine and raotine, one from each conjoined quark. Every quark gluon also has connection to a cosmean-string brane. Single Meson quarks are able to be conjoined without the agency of gluons. E.g. ...as in a beta neutron.

The Q-L model I have developed in order to provide the face-centered-relative EWF fixing points shows three layers of baryons. The top quarks are the most widely separated in an equilateral triangle form. The charm baryon consists of a slightly smaller parallel triangle which is offset (rotated around the vertical axis) by several degrees to give the required connection angles for the EWF structure to SBF point alignment. The bottom quarks are arranged in a smaller triangle lined up with the center charm quark baryon. The baryon 'wafers' are equidistant.

If this was a crystal with faces then the individual crystalline faces -revealed by the twisting of the top baryon with relation to the others- forms faces which become portions of a larger tetrahedron. I can actually see the graphic of the three dimensional crystalline model and it is an interesting crystal indeed. I don't think such a crystalline form appears anywhere else in nature; although I couldn't be sure. Note: Shape and distance are important for strength even down at this level and this Q-L structure appears to be an extremely strong shape. I also couldn't say for sure whether retentive strings are length dependent but I suspect not.

You might now ask: How does the magnetic dipole structure fit with all that? Answer: ...in our physical analysis... to the side of the Q-L which is offset in the nucleon space. in the real multiplex world it would occupy the same space time with perturbative retention by cross brane forces.

So It's also connected to the various strings by its relevant branes. The magnetic dipole is not as elastic -if at all- as the EWF construct but it is dynamic and rotational through 90o eigenvectors on its strings. The branes in these dimensions are retentive but weaker at gluon brane  junctions, and the center brane also has the lowest binding force due to the usual force decay towards the center of multiple particle constructs. That doesn't apply to the EWF construct because the center brane in the Higg's superstruct is the cosmean brane which is strongly retentive. Note: gluons have variable brane relative binding force.

Now of course it should be understood that the magnetic dipole oscillations are responsible for the g factor and the elastic gyrations of the EWF are responsible for the form factor which is dynamic and interrelated with the g factor via the inter-dimensional force dynamics. It is also an affected variable as a result of the Q-L itself gyrating around* inside the nucleon which is a priori dependent upon external and internal environmental forces.

*This doesn't indicate 'spin'.

 

Right at the Higg's brane on the EWF superstruct (SS) is where we discover the relationship between light 'flux' energy and mass. When a force related to the exhibition of a Higg's derived mass is vectored to any end of the SS it causes a wave vibration in its particular EWF structure. The cosmean brane at the Zo boson opens and closes in sync. This is where the relationship to emr and electron behavior and also where light quanta emission occurs and the rate of the emission of photon quanta is directly proportional to the 'mass' derived at the Higg's boson. So this 'm' becomes more relatable to the light flux density rather than simplistically 'f' or 'c'* so therefore 'y' is seen to be so much related to energy and mass as 'c' is. This was all involved in the derivation process for the energy equations in a prior section.

*These are OK for calculating individual photon energies.

 

N.B.  Gauge bosons might be made of articles which could just be sub bosons in another dimension. The cosmean brane is able to place some or all of a brane attached particle fully into the cosmean femtospace-string-brane entity. In such a state those particles (or parts thereof) are undetectable, and parity violations may be observed.

When a violent enough impact occurs and a nucleon is shattered; the particles so ejected might retain their connection to their string long after they have left the nucleon until such a time as they are absorbed into other nucleonic matter in which case new particles that weren ' t expected to be seen could become evident. This is also a mechanics for entanglement. Interlocution is different in that it is a near field data communication phenomenon. Note: when analyzing particles care must be taken when identifying -1 and +1 coulombic charged particles. These can be either electron or negatron and proton or positron respectively, and their masses may be disarmingly similar to their higher order mother particles. So these are able to mimic each other in many aspects except that negatrons and positrons are unable to form or exist in quantum state orbital systems. IE atoms.

Caveat applies: If you thought nucleons were tiny little 'round' things then you might have to think again. If you thought they were evenly balanced in every respect; ditto. The logic proposes that randomness produces the unknowable blob, which is essentially what we had as particles in the pre universe state.

The nucleon has the propensity to have an imbalanced emf factor which allows the diversity of characteristics in elements. In any given atom the shape of the orbitals could be non concentric and even non unilateral (1H hydrogen is a no brainer). The whole atom might not be anywhere near spherical. If you analyze the electron diagram as well, you will see that this is the likely reason for the Pauli asymmetry.

If we return to the proposed 'nucleon space filling matrix' phenomenology we find that because the nucleons have an unbalanced and limited SBF binding capability that the various constructs derive various atomic emr-field statistics which results in similarly variant characteristics. For instance just the addition of one proton neutron pair to an outer nuclear shell can predict the reconfiguration of the whole matrix -or at least that shell- which would be somewhat disproportional to the small physical change just described. This could result in a further more noticeably significant change in the melting point say. E.g. note the difference here between mercury and gold. This is all in support of my prior contention -described a little differently- that dimension shifts within nucleons are related to internal and even external emr data.

A study of the nucleon model and the characteristics of the EWF Higg's superstructs determine them to be not only elastic but flexible as well and gyrations are able to be a feature to allow bonds of opportunity and it would be likely that the superstructs are all aiming inward at the outer nucleon shell. This also allows that the SBF points are also flexible and dynamic in a limited spatial sense. This would all contribute to characteristic and periodic variability in the periodic table. That alone would see the prediction of patterned variant elemental characteristics exclusively from the G-theory model. This should be seen to be strongly supportive of the model.

Apart from the form factor and EWF constructs the nucleon is open to the environment. However these emr and EWF/SBF entities provide formidable protection for the integrity of the nucleon and by extension -but to a lesser degree- the nucleus, and furthermore to the whole atom whilst exhibiting conditionally weaker binding/bonding in molecular and higher order materials.

The internals of a nucleon shouldn't be taken to be completely inert. The volatility and dynamics within a nucleon is what makes the universe tick. If gravity were to disappear, floating around in the air with the earth flying off into space would be the least of our problems because the nucleons in your body would rapidly cool by losing particles and consequently energy.

 

 

 

GRAPHICAL QUANTUM MODELS

 

Some of you will have by now come to the true realization that everything is made of the same fundamental building block... the trion. The trion and its higher order constructs are based on these fundamental biracial charge particles, separated and/or co/conjoined with various strings and branes in a complex multiplex manner.

In their uniracial form the trions can be either neutrinos or W bosons in various dimensions and states. In their bound form they constitute gluons, Z bosons and pions. From these the greater constructs are formed (including gravitons and photons etc. extending further to higher order photon and emr packets. These bosons may be considered to be virtual multiplex 'bricks' in the basic fermionic constructs... the beta neuron, the proton and the electron.

Depicted below are three dimensional models. The first is a fact fitting model of a beta neutron quark lattice revealing the accurate divisibility into a proton and electron with all the charge sums still intact. I.e. the neutron is exactly net zero charge while the proton is exactly net +1 charge while the electron is -1; and the surplus anti neutrino is ejected during B-ve decay; which all fits the facts.

Following that is a stylized 3D model of a 1H atom. This includes a little -not very artistic- license. It should be made clear that the bottom quark boson group tier (being depicted) has its top boson layer skewed around the axis by the twisting of the EWFs during SBF bonding to protons and other neutrons. The other color charge groups are similar but bound to the femtospace and so are not conducive to the overall charge (F.S.)

Note 2: The electron only leaves the structure as one boson group of three quarks. It leaves its color charge quarks behind with the femtospace and these in turn become effective in providing the new proton with many potential variables for dynamic activity over a neutron. The proton is the true engine of the universe. Refer to the following/facing page.

 

IMAGE IN THESIS ebook ONLY

 

Simplified 3D model of a charge zero 12D Beta neutron.

 

Charge +1... top three tier boson group ... proton

Charge -1 ... bottom tier boson group ... electron

 

The quarks are formed by the relevant corners of the tier groups

Only one color charge is shown; the other non charge conducive color quark groups are depicted in simplification as being attached to the femtospace) F.S. Note: I guess the lepton scenario in physics is flawed, because an anomalous tier group separation would result in muons instead of hadrons.

 

 

IMAGE IN THESIS ebook ONLY

 

1H hydrogen isotope (stylized). The arms are situated in a vortex swirl shape and both the fermions are simplified.

 

 

Now that you've studied these you will probably realize that an atom is mostly made out of string-connected and brane-bound biracial W bosons and the idea that the latter can become neutrinos. In addition to the particles that have already been named neutrinos; this answers the enigma of why there are so many neutrinos whizzing around out there when very few -if any- other sub boson or boson articles are. Note 1: This also explains why many particles are either not evident at all or for very long outside of a nucleus.

Note 2: From this you should be able to correctly conclude that neutrinos are not quarks, baryons, mesons, or gluons.

Quarks are three biracial W bosons, a baryon is three quarks, a meson is two quarks, a pion is four W bosons and a gluon is two W bosons.

Having determined that: A W boson can actually be a neutrino in another dimensional state. Why then does it have no charge? Answer: A neutrino can also be a dimensionally displaced quark, gluon and a pion which deliver four flavors. Even though these particles would be traditionally assumed to have differing wave function; two will probably be confused with each other and two will have a fundamental perturbative charge and as well as that; a perturbative penta-boson neutrino is not out of the question either. Still according to the current paradigm; all of these will have varying wave function and they are able to combine weakly and tentatively. These are trion strings that I theorized earlier which reach a limit of stability. In other words neutrinos are just dimensionally shifted bits of destroyed fermions.  Note: The antiparticles are just the same boson arrangements with opposite chirality as well as probably variant fundamental charges.

 

On a different note: If you ever read the inept description of reasons for variable wave function in what are supposed to be fundamental particles you will find the analysis full of non phenomenological assumptions regarding... I’ll let you see for yourself on this free to air blog post originally posted on ‘Wiki’... 

 

Neutrino oscillation arises from a mixture between the flavor and mass eigenstates of neutrinos. That is, the three neutrino states that interact with the charged leptons in weak interactions are each a different superposition of the three neutrino states of definite mass. Neutrinos are created in weak decays and reactions in their flavor eigenstates[nb 1]. As a neutrino propagates through space, the quantum mechanical phases of the three mass states advance at slightly different rates due to the slight differences in the neutrino masses. This results in a changing mixture of mass states as the neutrino travels, but a different mixture of mass states corresponds to a different mixture of flavor states. So a neutrino born as, say, an electron neutrino will be some mixture of electron, mu, and tau neutrino after traveling some distance. Since the quantum mechanical phase advances in a periodic fashion, after some distance the state will nearly return to the original mixture, and the neutrino will be again mostly electron neutrino. The electron flavor content of the neutrino will then continue to oscillate as long as the quantum mechanical state maintains coherence. It is because the mass differences between the neutrinos are small that the coherence length for neutrino oscillation is so long, making this microscopic quantum effect observable over macroscopic distances.

If you've ever read the inept description and 'less than convincing' reasons for variable wave function in what are supposed to be fundamental particles under the current paradigm. At least I can only imagine that's what I imagine the supposition of 'oscillation' is referring to. has anyone seen a neutrino oscillate? You would likely find such analysis to be full of non phenomenological assumptions regarding... I’ll let you see for yourself on this free to air blog post originally posted on 'Wiki'...

  

Neutrino oscillation arises from a mixture between the flavor and mass eigenstates of neutrinos. That is, the three neutrino states that interact with the charged leptons in weak interactions are each a different superposition of the three neutrino states of definite mass. Neutrinos are created in weak decays and reactions in their flavor eigenstates [nb 1]. As a neutrino propagates through space, the quantum mechanical phases of the three mass states advance at slightly different rates due to the slight differences in the neutrino masses. This results in a changing mixture of mass states as the neutrino travels, but a different mixture of mass states corresponds to a different mixture of flavor states. So a neutrino born as, say, an electron neutrino will be some mixture of electron, mu, and tau neutrino after traveling some distance. Since the quantum mechanical phase advances in a periodic fashion , after some distance the state will nearly return to the original mixture, and the neutrino will be again mostly electron neutrino. The electron flavor content of the neutrino will then continue to oscillate as long as the quantum mechanical state maintains coherence. It is because the mass differences between the neutrinos are small that the coherence length for neutrino oscillation is so long, making this microscopic quantum effect observable over macroscopic distances.

 

This is from someone who hasn't yet even got a phenomenology for the fundamental cause of mass! I mean; what on earth is a 'mass eigenstate'? When did mass become a vector? Disappearing neutrinos are the ones they should have the real problem with. Note: I have highlighted the gross assumptions with pure drivel in this color. In fact it should all be in this color!  I can't even qualify the writer's conclusion. It appears that some physicists spend more time learning big words than developing a common sense theory of everything. Granted the standard model has a lot to offer but they just have great difficulty explaining or even interpreting their findings so theoretical nonsense becomes a fine art form.

 

neuvophysics.com