neuvophysics.com

A selection of phenomenon which don't require
quantum mechanics or relativity as taught by your professors.

Warning--- content possibly tampered with

Subject papers available from the contact tab.
Please click and paste the title in the subject
box of the email. You need no further communication. All trace of your email
will be deleted immediately the e-copy is sent.

All communications are completely
confidential and no uninvited correspondence will be entered into by
any means for any reason and/or by any party.

---G-THEORY INTRODUCTION
e-BOOK

---G-THEORY THESIS e-BOOK

---QUANTUM STATE STATISTICS*

---THE DIRAC FOUR-FIELD
AND LORENTZ INVARIANCE

VIOLATION

---THE CAUSE OF THE PAULI EXCLUSION PRINCIPLE

&
ELECTRON
ORBITAL QUANTASIZATION

---THE
THEORIZED INTRICATE AND DYNAMIC

INTERNAL STRUCTURE OF NUCLEONS

---
THE G-THEORY MODEL OF ELECTRON

ORBITALS AND THEIR DERIVATION

---A
RESPONSE TO THE 'SIX POSTULATIONS'

OF QUANTUM MECHANICS

---SALT FOR AN OPEN WOUND

---ELECTRON BEAM SLIT BEHAVIOR &
ANALYZING THE QUANTUM MECHANICS AND PHYSICS
BEHIND THE 'DOUBLE BEAM SLIT'
EXPERIMENT

thesis teaser extract 1
---QUANTUM STATE STATISTICS:
According to G-theory
there are five multiplex states which are common to all fermions (in
particular) but there are four remaining multiplex states that only apply to
nuclei. In singular consideration of electrons there are four possible known
quantum states other than any proposed interactive multiplex states which are
as follows...

(1) Principal quantum number state

(2) Azimuth state

(3) Magnetic quantum number state

(4) Spin state.

(5) The spectrographic parity state. This is caused by an interaction
with nuclear multiplex states via the factors and this will be addressed.

The first two relate to
the shell and shell position respectively which leaves the next two to provide
enough difference to meet the PEP requirements for all the possible fillings
required for the periodic table. That doesn't provide enough permutations so
another variable is brought into the mix; I.e. Z axis preference 'ms'. That
would have seemed to be enough until the Hydrogen fine structure was analyzed
so relativity was brought to the rescue. How can G-theory overcome such a
daunting problem?

thesis teaser extract 2
---
Along
with the quantum numbers the(se) eight combinations of dipole and spin alone
are able to account for the fine structure of hydrogen without dubious
relativistic explanations---

---
For
example: If the n1 fundamental q-number is included as only requiring an
electron of any state; then when shifting shells to the n2 and n3 numbers, just
the four proposed spin states allows the hydrogen fine structure to be
realizable *(e.g. 2p
1/2, 3p
1/2
3p1/3, 2p3/2, 3p3/2, 3d3/2,
3d5/2
---that's three
q-numbers and four spin states or two spin states and two moments). So if
Z-axis preference is ruled out, then we still have two spin states and two
magnetic moment state combinations which can still provide four different
relative states so 'ms' is not required in the hydrogen case---

Sorry: If the shell
information doesn't come out as expected on this website. It does in the paper.

Thesis teaser extract
3
---

A STARTLING CONCLUSION OR
TWO:

Under the current paradigm
of gravity; imagine the force on the center atom of the earth. Well by G-theory
a similar squeezing force of about 6e11N/kg is acting on every single nucleon
of the earth as well as your body but with an insignificant force differential
of 10N/kg (weight affect). The force across each nucleon is the same but the
vector sum is not. Imagine if gravity was taken away: The idea that you might
end up looking something like a puffer fish is putting it mildly. Floating up
from the ground would be the least of your worries. The diastatic effect on
your body would be double the unistatic affect you would experience upon
finding yourself suddenly transported right next to a black hole.

From this we are able to
draw the conclusion that gravity is a surprisingly powerful force which
accounts for about 99.9% of the force that holds nucleons bound in atomic
nuclei. It is this M_{g} inertial mass that accounts for most of the
difference between a proton and electron mass.

On another subject: The
Lorentz transformation and the relativities could be considered to be
mathematical gobbledygook based on the constancy of 'c' in and between all
reference frames. It is truly astounding mathematics from equally astounding
minds but the problems still remain, and science has finally fallen into the
trap of declaring the mathematics to be the mechanics as in wave particle
duality theory with symmetry making and breaking -of the wave function of
photons along the time continuum- as the source of energy, mass and matter.
Show me a quantum loop and I'm your man! The acceptance of this sort of stuff
as real science should never be the case: Empiricism and substantive mechanics
should rule.

Relativity has been crying
out for any substantive reality to which it is able to be applicable. Here it
is! But 'c' is only considered to be a constant relative to the reference frame
of the universe. To other reference frames it has changed. There goes the
Lorentz transformation/invariance. G-relativity in the geodesic form in cahoots
with Einstein's field equations is still useful for the mathematical
representation of gravity.

Don't get me wrong. The
emission velocity of 'c' from an atom anywhere in the universe is pretty much
the same. The problem comes when things get moving, and this enigma I have
aggressively addressed.

The difference between
technology and science is that the first requires a result that works or it's
back to the 'drawing board', while science can become moribund in a mathematics
that almost seems to work because science doesn't have an economic product to
sell. So in that case scientists just sell themselves (their souls?) and
continue on while receiving massive pay checks with fading and suspicion bound
promises of a final solution trailing in their wake. Wait until the public
finds out that the LHC is probably the greatest single- entity contributor to greenhouse
gases or nuclear waste on the face of the earth. Do I feel duty bound to inform
them?

Lots of folks thought that
mad scientists at CERN were going to send us all into oblivion in a black hole.
Don't worry; that won't happen but the mad scientists are going to use a slower
process called climate change by the looks of it. That's if you actually
believe that to be the greatest threat facing mankind. I don't think many of
those self same scientists actually believe in that at all!

Having done all I can to
deconstruct and reconstruct the physics; I guess it's time to present a
unifying theory for the known forces of gravity, SBF, Coulombic charge and EWF/
electromagnetism. Note: there are arguments as to which are the real forces and
how many there are. I won't address that because until at such times as we can
get all the data such as the physical sizes of nuclear quark lattices and
nucleons per se we can't even expect to be able to generate a true equation.

However I suspect that
something along the lines of the gravitational equation featured elsewhere in
this thesis will be the likely contender. Having said all that; I still promote
the following theory of unified fields.

First find that the
magnetic fields of fermions/hadrons is as described herein and that the quark
lattice which is held bound to the gravitational femptospace is as proposed
also.

Now enter the theory of the
pion connected EWF Higg's superstruct as the connection which transfers out the
quark lattice biracial color forces as described.

If all of that has been
well theorized then there should be a plausible road leading to field
unification or the theory is debunkable.

UNIFIED FIELD
THEORY (UFT)

We have convincingly shown
that gravitational force is probably the strongest force which holds nucleons
together in the structural form being proposed as well. This unknown fact is
one of the reasons why the standard model can't provide a UFT.

We have shown that -in
G-theory- gravitational and other inertial effects are faithfully transferred
elastically via the EWF construct to the SBF junctions and visa versa. However
the gravitational effects are exclusively derived and exhibited in the QL
femtospace inside the quark lattice.

This shows a direct and
binding connection between gravity and the SBF via the elastic EWF. Therefore a
binding connection between those three has been established.
Note: excuse
the pun.

The coulombic charge force
proceeds
from* and is directly connected to that quark lattice which inelastically
holds the femtospace and its intimate connection with gravity via the nuclear
graviton 'sea'** and that connection has now been established.

The EWF force appears to be
weak but it is a balanced force and as such it allows the SBF to exhibit a very
narrow band of effectiveness. If its pions and combinations fly apart we see
the -ve, +ve and neutral coulombic charges of which each of three EWF
constructs consist.

Electromagnetism is only
loosely connected via Marjorana junction perturbative effects. This means that
whilst the full magnetic dipole moment of the nuclear dipoles is presented to
space similar to the full charge field. -both according to their individual
attenuation statistics- The actual value of those charges which are
attributable to the EWF construct is low; and that is what has already been
concluded in the standard model.

This means that any direct
connection of causality between gravity and either electro- or straight
magnetism is not possible and any theory of gravitomagnetism is not supported
by the evidence.

So even though there is no
direct connection between the magnetic dipole and gravity or the SBF force
junction. There is a strong connection via the electron orbitals within
functional matter via the G-factor and also for the charge field via the form
factor. So both of those equations are able to be fitted to any new unified
field equation, and that is close to hand.
Note: See, I leave the hard stuff
to you guys.

*Charge
and magnetism don't emanate or flow. They move with their relevant field
producing particles only. Refer to thesis.

**Some
refer to these as sea gluons floating around in the Fermi- Dirac sea. G-theory
refers to that in a more defined sense as the -GD density relative- 'graviton
repository' existing within every nucleonic femtospace.

CONCLUSION:

G-theory provides a
definitive UFT but at the moment a useful equation isn't yet forthcoming.

Having said that: There are
some constants and principles which appear to be quite pertinent.

Planck's constant

Dirac's fine constant

Bonney's gravitational
energy loss constant 'z' (G-theory)

The N-metric gravitational
equation.

---and more.

INFINITY AND WAVE FUNCTION IN THE
VACUUM

Now that I've got your attention; In future I
will be referring to wave function as VM multiplex states.

Multiplex states don't exist in the external
space. They only exist where biracial particles exist and are variously bound
together on branes at Marjorana junctions.

These states are determined by combinations of
the traditional quantum states with extra VM states. The vacuum becomes
modified in accordance with entanglement statistics which are produced by
variations in atomic nucleus shell filling statistics.

The vacuum per se exists outside of atoms but
the modified entanglements travel with particles which are roaming free and we
observe particles in the vacuum which have modified entanglement statistics.
For instances two pions bound by a Higg's Zo boson within a nucleus' nucleon.
Will have different dimensional statistics when removed from the atom and that
will change further over time leading to more decay/annihilation. This is why
particles decay/annihilate because the entanglement is soon lost due to cosmean
(really eos) law.

Now because of this we can expect variations in
the nuclear space filling parameters to result in protons -in particular-
having variable and proportional predictable interactability with various
dimensions.

The amazing thing here is: If a proton has no
statistical interactability with any given dimension then any particle existing
in that dimension or brane will be unable to bond with or collide with a
particular portion of that proton's matter content.

For example: The statistical relationship for
all nucleons with the gravitos dimension is zero except for the femptospace,
where graviton collision statistics rule so gravitons pass through every other
particle of matter without any hindrance or perturbation.

None of the dimensions are infinite except for
1/ the cosmea; which is external to all matter except for femptospaces and
black holes. 2/ the eos which is external to every nucleons' EWF Higg's
superstruct and which operates within a temperature window which is wide enough
for all universal activities.

The cosmea does little else but facilitate
gravity transfer with all deference given to the gravitos and photos including
propagation speed. Whereas its cosmic relative the eos is an instantaneous but
volatile energy-matter- data transfer dimension. Note: the speed of light and
gravity are not constants in a vacuum. They are only constants under the same
statistical environmental conditions. The two speeds are co-dependant but
generally constant for all intents and purposes except perhaps when determining
the age of the universe. We could call them 'steady state' constants.

The eos and cosmea both recognize nil spatial
size within their spheres of operation. A speck is as good as a million light
years. If the eos needed to it would send some annihilation products from here
to Betelgeuse for purposes of parity. However that sort of distance is never
required because most particles are available closer to hand.

Entanglement will extend the distance over
which the eos will operate. If entanglement of two particles can be kept and
the particles separated over any distance; the VM states will remain the same
until annihilation eventually occurs. Because of entanglements, annihilation
products do not always turn out the same.

There is some serious disarray and non
predictive behaviour going on there. Yes annihilation statistics are generally
predictable but with random surprises if the conditions are not kept to be the
same. For instance a couple of particles might decay back into the vacuum but
the eos will remove those particles to 'somewhere' and return some often
unexpected particles of matter back after a fleeting moment of time. Unexpected
matter forms they may be but the momenta will always be the same relative to
the temperature and other VM states.

The eos fills all the gaps between every single
Marjorana junction. The nothing's perfect law must apply and I'm sure there are
some collisions.

In your standard
wave-function-symmetry-collapse-space-time artistic drivel theories. Everything
is supposed to align with some Laplacian perfection of space time where every
photon only exists because of the existence of the collapsing space time at 'c'
in the right direction.

Mental brain functions are supposed to occur
ditto by utilizing some kind of mental photons I guess.

However when it comes to the mind in G-theory
there is no room for the transmission of mental energy by waves at all. OMG and
I thought I had a brainwave! LMAO. However having said that; I can't disallow
the capacity for the brain to chemically induce changed VM states -and hence
entanglement statistics- over an infinitely large and simultaneously small
vacuum of space. Mmmm, might be able to send telepathic messages after all---
or pray I guess LOL.

Perhaps the other mental brain functions can be
put to good use to answer some of these curly behaviours by wave function etc
phenomena. Mmm.

Those mathematical theories are really just an
algorithm away from being virtual reality on a computer screen. Oh sorry they
already are--- Just check out you tube. When virtual reality ever becomes
reality I'll believe those artistic theories but not until then!

neuvophysics.com