A POSTULATION: (Note for website readers: This assertation contains some terms and names of tensors which with you will not be familiar. Short of ordering and studying the thesis you should be able to figure it out.)





This is a speculative theory of origins: The simplicity of this speculation is for the purposes of overview only, and it is being presented because both the big bang and steady state universe models have no possible fit to G-theory. As well as that, even though I consider the building blocks of the standard quantum theory to be substantially correct; attempting to shoehorn a plausible fit of G-theory into any current models of applied relativistic quantum theory seems as daunting as attempting to unify classical physics with contemporary quantum physics for similar reasons. G-theory therefore must be shown to be a unifying agent between the two and not just a makeover of one of them. Of course to do that it requires that astro physics must also be relatable as well. So in a postulative analysis of origins don't be surprised that I begin at the micro level…

This speculation is not about origins of everything. Whether or not you believe in creation or self emergence of stuff or what stuff actually is, is beside the point. I will admit that logic causes me to accept fiat creation as the cause of stuff. I guess any other opinion remains valid if logic is seen to be the crutch of the weak minded.

Metaphysics and fantasy are the stuff of the mind, which can only lead to scientific discovery if the theories so concocted can drive such postulations in a mathematical, scientifically logical and most importantly in a substantive and empirically legal sense towards acceptability as fact. Whether this speculation concurs with these criteria is for you to judge but bear in mind that it is just that; reasoned speculation.

An example of the evolution of physics into metaphysics can be found in the historical understanding of black holes: At first they were thought to be huge bodies with fantastic gravities, and then they were considered to be massive warps in the space continuum. With that artful devolvement physicists began to contemplate the idea of a singularity but they could only allow themselves to consider a golf ball size singularity with an incredible 'mass' but as with all progressive theories this eventually becomes reduced to the size if a pin head. From there we soon find the idea being presented that the singularity is a space time warp of an infinitely small size were time actually stops. The next natural progression from there was what we find now; that the singularity has zero size and zero 'mass'. Finally they get it right! ---but for the wrong reasons. Time doesn't stop for anyone or anything. Can't you see how ridiculous that idea really is. Oh; your mind is on a higher plane of understanding is it? Perhaps--- on another planet--- would be a better description, or else please decare to the folks what you've been smoking. Note: Maybe the next 'logical' determinant in that sequence will lead to the concept of inside out matter and reverse expanding time huh? Remember; I thought of it first!

All that 'bagging out' aside: Such a phenomenon is disallowed even in the traditional three plus one dimensional universe. By completely disregarding that -even on the philosophical basis that if something is deemed to exist then it must be existing in the time frame of the observer- the possible evolution of thought begins to devolve into pure metaphysical speculation whereby the black hole becomes a kind of doorway into another universe of uncertain character. In presenting such an understanding the physicists are actually defying the laws of the universe for no valid reason. Magic has no place in physics so I intend to provide the required reasons for any diversion of quantum physics from the classical laws.

Quantum mechanics is also being analyzed by its faithful investigators, and principles are advanced regarding the observances but to date no understanding of any possible phenomenology has ensued.  I don't expect any either but I must see their point for I suspect many quantum physicists of having a quick look before turning away, often disregarding it completely, and they carry on with their experiments in even more willful disregard of the fact that their own observances are never predictable of actual particle activity in free unadulterated space either because for one, they have injected their measuring devices into the experiments and corrupted the data. In the case of colliders this is particularly true and the only hope the physicist have for a tiny peephole into the micro world is by analyzing particles in conditions they suspect were around at the time of the big bang and attempting to extrapolate from there. Please interpolation is legal and useful but not extrapolation, so bear all this in mind (as well as the historical failure of the models so derived to come anywhere close to the truth) as you follow the narrative below. Note: This postulation was not the forerunner of G-theory; it came about by studying the concepts of the fact fitting G-theory model and retrofitting it to known universal observations.




The following is deemed to have occurred almost instantaneously at first and then began to rapidly slow, and -whether Euclidean or Belatramic- not necessarily at any determinable or even steady rate. I must therefore arbitrarily incrementalize the first instant of creation for at least the time it takes to explain it.

This postulation is an interpolation in that it fills in the 'bit' between the beginning and the end. In order to achieve that it assumes that the preexisting cosmea existed in a timeless cocoon of infinite 'three dimensional' space. It must have existed at zero degree k without any motion or energy expenditure. It was -in effect- an infinite cosmean sized black hole existing in the hyperverse* and -even though subjectively existent- both time and size had no relevance. Even though it was all cold dark and motionless, the cosmea was however subject to a-priori laws which it had never before been required to obviate because nothing had ever moved or changed before.

As far as that hyperverse -herein referred to as the cosmea- is concerned; any point of reference is equal to any and all others.  A mile is as good as a light year or conversely a femtometer. It is important to concede that such a subjectivism is only applicable to the cosmea and not our present universe. However that still sort of validates proponents of the idea that every point in the universe is the central point to its own reference frame and that the big bang began at all points at once because the universe is infinite. That's patently ridiculous when considered from the reference frame of the universe, but not from that of the cosmea. However it may be concluded to have been universally true at the instant of the creation event, so I concur if even only for that instant. But truly isn't that all that's required to support that idea.

There is another problem with any idea of the autonomous rise of atomic matter in that a full quantum loop has never yet been observed or produced artificially. The requirements for nucleosynthesis therefore include the existence of fully formed nucleons in the first place and most specifically deuteron is a necessary nuclear variant. Other than the miracle of assisted or fully fiat creation, there is no possible phenomenology to support any other origins other than something similar to that which follows; and as you will notice such a requirement for miracles still remains. Other than that; if it wasn't for the understood laws of physics we could well imagine the universe to be eternal. Therefore we have to accept that it cant' be everlasting so--- Note: I can understand why there are weird ideas floating around out there. The proponents are getting an inkling of what's/been going on. However they seem to be loathe to face facts and what they don't yet understand is that any application of their non physical subjectivisms to the now physical universe becomes absurd. No! I didn't say those thinkers were absurd. It's the blanket application of the as yet unrecognized cosmean physics to the physics of the known universe which is; but only for lack of a reasonable theory of the universe-cosmea interrelationship. In other words ideas that may well apply to the infinite cosmea can't be married ad hoc to the cosmo-universe with any companion logic.

*The totality of the unknowable envelope of all that exists.






At the time of the origins--- an incomprehenible number of intricate relationships involving forces of various strengths and elasticity, retaining and releasing particles of various states, (even some like those theorized in standard notions of quantum physics) became immediately observable and increased to almost infinite variation as the universe cooled. Note: I believe that uncertainty principle is applicable not just to velocity and spatial position but also to extreme temperature states with resulting effect on quantum states and even extending to the Pauli Exclusion Principle and Fermi state/level effects as well but only in observation. Note also: The uncertainty principle is not an agent of affect or for effect.


Keeping all jurisprudence applicable to that hyper energy event; in that first creative instant something happened that changed the cosmea (ancient cosmos) forever. That original ('soft' and invisible) pre-universe  was shattered by a violent force and concurrent with this behemoth event was the immediate exhibition and discovery of other dimensions and a-priori but latent laws and principles. One of those other dimensions (multiplex tensors in the vacuum)* which had been lying dormant (in observational effect only) was that of the chronos (time)**. Time appeared as an anomaly in a cosmea which had never (know-ably) before experienced motion as far as we can tell. The cosmea in its newly shattered condition now also discovered other laws pertaining to 'itself'. The first law it discovered was the law of self conservation (vv energy consv.).

*Refer to 'vacuum polarization' in the definitions.

**Stephen Hawking would argue it was the rise of time itself that actually caused the event. Be that as it may. Upon the reading of what follows it becomes a moot point of loaded personal opinion. I am not so lax in my treatment of time in regard to any proposed ability for it to be any agent of causality at all. This is for valid reasons which will be forthcoming.


So the praetoms (preeminent matter particles TBE) of the cosmea attempted to keep jurisprudence and obey that law, and in so doing instantaneously cause the closure of the rent. But upon moving over any distance at all they found themselves quite unable to move instantly at the requisite infinite speed because of the new and previously unrealized laws of the chronos. At that moment in time they also and consequently discovered more applicable laws and the first law of the cosmea was then relegated to the status of 'principle'.

The first law of the cosmo-universe discovered was that motion requires force and that such motion produces the notion of the release or use of energy. So by now moving at a finite speed the praetoms also found realization of the existence of other dimensions- the presence of which also became obvious as a direct result of this requirement of the cosmean praetoms to apply full legal attempt towards obedience to the laws of their own cosmean dimension.

Another law soon discovered, -when that cosmean matter moved into the 'voids' now existing in their preeminent dimension- was that when some of these praetoms -in attempting the escape back to the cosmea which was now more or less spatially distant- began to inadvertently attempt to occupy the same place at the same time.

In those numerous but vain attempts they discovered the loss of energy during the resultant collisions; and -in some cases- some of them began to also experience dimensionally arbitrated perturbative drag and other motion disturbing forces, but in the main they therefore just decelerated and experienced directional change as well as the loss of their energy -among other things. The third law of thermodynamics was now in full effect and hard matter had now come into existence. Note: As difficult as it may be to comprehend; the comea consisting of an unbound matrix of praetoms would be unobservable because it takes 'vacuum modification' or atomic bonding via the agency of electron bonds to make any matter become 'hard' so to speak.

The eos (cosmo universe vacuum) still attempted/attempts/has never stopped attempting to obey that first law/principle of the cosmea by always providing apparently sufficient force to enable instantaneous motion to effect the repair. However the newly realizable dimension of time unfortunately elicited the arousal of another force/law into the mix. THIS FORCE WE CURRENTLY RECOGNIZE AS INERTIAL FORCE which legally causes an acceleration or deceleration RATE, which by law is a constant under similar 'mass' and force constraints, and by classical physics it is thought to be caused by something strangely thought of as the intrinsic inertial mass of an object.

This is strange indeed because by modern contemporary physics objects are thought to contain other types of mass as well. I.e. gravitational mass and binding energy 'mass'; which isn't considered to be real 'mass' at all. If such contemporary theory all sounds ridiculous; it's because to some extent it is! This will be shown to be the case by replacing the specious method of 'the theorizing of different forms of mass being transposable as energy.' That is flawed science.

Having said that it is probably surprising to note that G-theory itself proposes different kinds of mass but the difference is; in so doing it theorizes real phenomenology for different portions of mass and not just an airy-fairy supposition of different forms of 'mass-energy' wherein there lies no phenomenology at all. In G-theory the separate forms of mass (including mass at the quantum level) all relate perfectly to Newtonian classical mass and such methodology actually does provide answers!

On with the show: Now all this proposed kinetic activity can be thought to have occurred during the first moments of creation during which the cosmea discovered time, motion, kinetic energy, inertial mass etc. The praetoms (having lost energy by novel matter collisions/perturbations etc) now ran into a little problem, in that by losing energy they were unable to remain as cosmean praetoms and many of them actually transformed into something else at the first fundamental instant. This something else we call deuterons and the cosmo-universe had now become a recognizable reality in space-time. As the system cooled most of these early denizens of the new universe that were in close proximity to each other quickly assimilated under those perect conditions and thereafter became extremely stable as robust helium four nuclides.

The surplus matter that the praetoms had originally contained was in that event instantly turned into energy (sub particles in motion BBR) of all descriptions which headed back to the cosmea at almost infinite speed. Even though collisions and perturbations were occurring everywhere the statistical conclusion must be that many of them would have made it and for an instant the third law's reign might have seemed to be almost an absolute. Much of this energy was by way of fission type emission components and much by fusion decay components.

This birth pang energy that was almost instanteneously released throughout the universe would have been totally beyond phenomenal and to the remote 'observer' a blinding flash of universally wide light would have been the evidence seen. This process and those derived light emissions would have occurred at countless points in the universe at once. I suggest it was not at all a 'big bang' or an explosion of matter and energy from a single point; it is proposed to have been initiated in the first instance by a vast shattering in the cosmea over a universe-wide area. I have no idea of the mechanics of that but it must have been caused by some sort of semi-elastic collision of indescribable force or a mechanical force, either exhibiting stupendous -but localized and varied- intensities!

One could argue that if the cosmea was being held in some sort of a timeless and perfect potential energy tension that the slightest flicker of motion always had the potential to set the whole thing off. Taking this tack draws the subjective argument closer to auto spontaneous origins but regardless of whether it took a flicker or a shove we are still faced with the necessity for extra-cosmean action and the profound question of where the infinite cosmea came from in the first place.

So still disallowing the idea of auto creation of being a possibility and to iterate more concisely: Instantly upon losing some of their potential energy, the innumerable quantity of praetoms that became trapped in the universe lost a great deal of their cosmean identity, and apart from massive soups of quark gluon plasma many at first became deuterons. There would also have been single protons or shattered neutrons, quarks, baryons and other sub particles of all descriptions existing in their new environs at hyper elevated temperatures, and then as they lost more energy and devolved to more entropic states (because of the predicates of the zeroeth law of thermodynamics) and consequently cooled, a great quantity would also have became atoms by forced atomic fusion nucleosynthesis by way of partial quantum loops which have been experimentally observed. Many of these praetoms formed atomic bonds and became molecules by such well known processes and all by the utilization of many different quantum particles garnered from the rich pickings of ingredients available in that volatile ex-cosmean soup.

Quark gluon plasma would have been extremely extensive at the time and as it cooled it would have become space gas. Note: Indicative left over baryon-rich matter still exists to this day as filaments in the so called intergalactic medium.

These new atoms however now contained less potential energy  (matter content) than the praetoms from which they were derived.  At this juncture I will attempt the difficult speculation as to how exactly praetoms might have become atoms. Note: This process is treated in greater detail in chapter 16.

The best way to address this problem in retrospect is to first consider the probable laws of dimensions:  As we noted earlier we now find that the cosmea is being retro-affected by a law of the chronos which states that atomic matter objects (AMOs) cannot occupy the same space at the same time or else! Praetoms -being of similar makeup- also found themselves in this position and in so doing lost energy as well as mechanical integrity in many cases. So that law was an a-priori cosmean law.





A pre cosmo-universal praetom is arguably deemed to consist of the matter and energy of one (alpha)neutron and two protons. A typical deuteron ion consists of one neutron and one proton. A 2H hydrogen isotope consists of one neutron and one electron and one proton, which is essentially a neutron less the subsequently derived electron from B-ve decay. So in that analysis there was a fair amount of decaying and electron scavenging going on at the time. The praetoms lost at least the equivalent matter value of a whole neutron (proton/electron combo) which is about twice the theorized mass of a cosmic ray photon (full quantum packet). In other words an enormous amount of thermonuclear energy was released at the quantum level resulting in the massive expansion of matter by emission of particles; especially in hyper-hot regions where even the formation of 4He was impossible.

What we have here subjectively is a universe being formed by bombs of indescribable magnitude. Any radioactive isotopes formed at the time would have decayed within seconds or perhaps minutes or hours (you get the picture) being due to the almost infinite speed of light (TBE). (OK then; time was actually warped and very, very slow for all you back the front relativists).

Many lone hot (alpha)-neutrons began to rapidly undergo beta negative (B-) decay but the newly formed protons generated by this process found that when they had decayed to the point of losing an electron, any further decay was truncated. And whether or not they were being forced to assimilate or were otherwise bound together with beta-neutrons (TBE), their magnetic dipoles and electric fields caused a natural interaction with the electron/s which had just been emitted, and basic 1H ions/atoms were the likely result.

Considering the laws of randomness noted in the standard matter chart; the likelihood of praetoms becoming atoms of low complexity such as hydrogen and helium was high in comparison to their chances of becoming atoms of high complexity and to iterate; this is realized in the currently recognized spread of atoms in the universe. The nodal effects caused by the decelerative effects of drag/collisions and the interference nodes caused by convoluted randomness resulted in the creation of clouds of lesser and greater atoms giving rise to the periodic table of atomic 'densities'*. However it needs to be understood that masses of like heavy metallic elements would have been derived as transformed chunks of cosmean matter and these consist of cosmo-universal matter made exclusively with alpha neutrons which are an exact replica of a praetom. These are fast neutrons capable of B- decay. This is another subject which will be analysed.

Or else: This creation event allowed the collection over a short time of massive clouds of hydrogen and or helium and lesser clouds of denser atoms that (because of nodal constraints) found themselves gathered (at hyper velocity) into spatially positioned groups by a process called accretion. Note: Accretion is traditionally thought to occur by electrostatic charges being formed when particles rub against each other. I consider this approach to lack conviction and not be well thought out, and I contend that accretion was simply caused by chance nodal placement of huge volumes of matter combined with the attractive forces caused by gravitational, magnetic and charge field interactions. This is because sub atomic fermions have dipoles, and most matter exhibits some form of magnetic and biracial and/or electrostatic charge field. This accretion would not be readily observable on a place like earth because of the stronger force of earth's gravity compared with the weak overall gravity of the primordial 'gaseous matter cloud'. However the original gravity (GD) would have definitely played a greater role as the matter began to accrete.

*This theory of the formation of atoms from praetoms overcomes one of the great enigmas of physics. How did large masses of similar and high atomic number elements form? It is truly impossible to imagine that a construct of 'ionium' was created which magically remained stable long enough for it to be subsequently filled with a stupendous quantity of electrons that were also magically transported to the scene en masse. On the other hand it is also just as difficult to imagine how trillions and trillions of similar atoms could be accreted together by the slower process of chemical bonding. That doesn't make any sense. Therefore the idea that the agglomerates and elemental masses already pre-existed in a similar or related structural form is the likely scenario. The only idea left of pouring a 'bottle of electrons' into a structural formwork of cations just doesn't wash. In fact it's ludicrous to even suggest that one.

Deposition and accumulation by well known methods is an unlikely possibility but first that requires the positioning of a stupendously large gathering of similar atoms in the first place. Please describe a mechanics of causality for that first.


In any case: At the early stage of the 'instant' there was NO gravity or G-mass and the temperature of the atoms so formed immediately after the first massive emission and dispersion of energy was most likely close to the Bose Einstein condensate level at just above zero degrees Kelvin, and it would have existed under B-E (G) statistics, so in such a case the new atoms didn't fly apart by lack of gravitational assimilation force. Note: The reason for this phenomenology should become apparent to you upon a full study of G-theory. This is supportive of G-theory because standard cosmological physics theory could not allow this to occur. I will accept however that this is a non standard moment. The universe is in the first femtoseconds of creation and our understanding of temperature is just a notion!

The new atoms attempted to follow the law of the cosmea by which they were bound in the original praetomic state. This--- by the attempted immediate return to the cosmean state of motionlessness at zero degrees Kelvin, where rest energy would once again equal potential energy of ground state.

After the initial release of energy, all the atoms attempted to continue sending themselves back to the cosmea by radiating as much BBR (black body radiation) as possible; as well as by packaging themselves up, whenever Pauli and Fermi would allow, into quanta of matter down to the smallest sub particles of praetoms. Such I suspect are not photon or graviton bosons but even lower order fundamental particles called trions* (which are also theorized to be the singular sub-sub-sub particles of force and are the constituent matter in sub-quantum BBR). Other parcels of variable energy quanta will soon be noticed and these have come to be called various names (including cosmic photon quanta as full quantum-integer-boson-packets) of greater or lesser degrees conditionally vibrating at different frequencies in accordance with situationally derived emission energy levels.

*Some gravitons and/or their sub-particles (trions) were also emitted by BBR, but the greater graviton emissions towards the placement of universal gravity GD (consequential to the subsequent hyper elevated temperatures coincidental with the micro delayed post-imminent-future… time-incremental photon emissions -which occurred almost simultaneously within the fleeting window of the cosmo-universal birth event), was caused by a process which will be explained shortly. Sorry! I'll try and keep my descriptive phrases shorter. I.e. Light caused gravity!

Other means available to the atoms were undertaken in a futile attempt to return themselves to the cosmea by the utilization of other values and methods of propagatory energy including the emission of electro magnetic radiation propagated via the dimension/tensor of the propos, with BBR mainly being emitted via the gravitos or eos depending on the particle being emitted*. (This assumes that neutrons may actually do something after all: I.e. they either conditionally radiate gravitons or far more likely trions as BBR).

*Note that NASA has developed a microwave space drive. With light that is not possible. The two are not both in the same emr spectrum with any direct connection.


The dilemma facing atoms in attempting the return to the cosmea is that they actually have two possible ways of achieving this which are unfortunately self defeating because of their mutual exclusivity: These are---

1/ They can attempt to return to zero k by sending themselves to the cosmea as photonic and emr propagative energy. However because they possess no intelligence they do not realize the law of gradually decreasing returns (ability) with loss of energy and have found themselves to be pitifully subject to the third law of thermodynamics and if left alone in their attempts which are exacerbated by the zeroeth law of TD they will eventually find themselves almost totally devoid of the energy requirement to ever have a hope of becoming Praetoms again. They could then find themselves almost motionless and existing with extremely low sub quantum particle denstity statistics at a temperature somewhere close to the Bose Einstein condensate temperature with infinitely unavailable energy requirements to complete the journey back to the cosmea. (Unable to emit any more energy they will all be lost in cold dark space for time infinitum).

2/Conversely and paradoxically atoms are able in some circumstances to absorb enough energy until they reach the temperature realized at the event horizon of a black hole (which I call the Black hole significance temperature BST), and suddenly find themselves with the full amount of energy required to enable the return to being potential (sleep mass?) energy filled praetoms again and become assimilated back into the cosmea--- Which this theory suggests is exactly what is occurring in black holes and also at the outer universe/cosmea event horizon.

The Universe is theorized to be surrounded by the unaffected cosmea or hyperverse but because of the dimensional interweave of the cosmea linked eos with other dimensions in space-time, the cosmea also exists inside the physical dimensions of the universe in the form of black holes* of various sizes which are only dimensionally connected to the cosmean/hyper-verse via the eos and case specifically the cosmean dimension itself.

So if a person could enter a black hole or the cosmea without damage and with the right cosmological protections as well as cosmological hypervelocity capability and navigability, it remains within the realms of contention that one could reappear at any other point in the three dimensional Euclidean space of the ccosmo-universe via another black hole in an instant. This is purely subjective conjecture and appears to be currently and almost certainly forever out of the question, so this unlikely postulation doesn't in any way allow the idea of time or warp travel within the known universe, it just contains the hint of dimensional connectivity outside of the neo-universe interconnectivity of the realms of space and time.

*Probably including magnetars and neutron stars which are different in more than one aspect, being that for one they don't maintain a singular dimensional connection to cosmea.


If you are choking on that bit; then the following at first glance is likely to sound like pseudo-scientific 'clap-trap' but if you are a nuclear or high energy physicist please think for a second:





This double barreled approach to attempted return to the cosmea predicates a theory of a closed loop temperature range which makes just above zero k the same theoretical tipping point as the extremely high temperature realized at the event horizon of a black hole. This is not so unreasonable when you understand that temperature is not 'brrrr or whew!' Temperature is actually the (sometimes possible) measurement of the particle density proportional vibrational energy of a nucleon which is actually being caused by the internal jostling of the variable quantities of force particles TBE. Note: If you don't think I understand the likely objections that will be aimed at postulations such as this--- Take this as an example: I will be showing substantive phenomenology as to why atoms are able to contain a variable quantity of particles that exhibit mass on their own without significantly affecting the mass of the atom they are contained in and that atoms have a size relatable sub quantum particle density relative to temperature and pressure. I just can't possibly address every subject when it comes up. The thesis is written in the most logical order of subjects that I could organize. I trust you will find that the vast majority of contentious and enigmatic subjects are covered and solutions proposed.


In both these diverse temperature states nucleons are about to enter the cosmea whereby they will instantly cease all motion and in so doing lose all temperature in any case and the energy of any description that they are perceived to contain, is converted to cosmean dimension, ground state potential energy and the laws of physics are not being contravened. However the idea of the journey back to the cosmea via the losing of energy is truncated due to the impossibility of the attainment of zero k temperature in order to make the journey and be retrofitted with the reuired sub particles from the black hole say.

Putting it another way: This is only a paradox to the human mind and not to a mindless atom attempting to return to equilibrium by either a conveniently positioned black hole and the subsequent realization of maximum energy, or the unbeknownst futile attempt to return to zero k and reach the fempto black hole TBE. The real problem with attempting to return to the zero k temperature by the idea of doing so in the cosmo-universe is that of undergoing a complete loss of matter particles. In such an impossible case the particle would theoretically cease to exist. This is unlikely because of the law of diminishing returns. There is a limit to how far an atom can be left bereft of particles.

However on the up side; as soon as an atom converts to a praetom (in returning to cosmea) by attaining sufficient matter density at BST; quite paradoxically, once there it instantly reverts from the hyper elevated BST to zero k. This seems to be completely counterintuitive and impossible (but not if you understand what the 'idea' of temperature is) but the kinetic energy of vibrational momentum becomes instantly converted to potential energy by the atom's ceasing all motion and also losing all physical (universal matter content) 'mass' by reverting to praetom matter and existing once again in a time disassociated state. (I will not even attempt to theorize the exact mechanism of praetom reunification from atomic parts except to recognize that absolute zero and a state of utter 'timelessness' is never again attainable in the cosmea unless the whole universe is able to be completely reabsorbed*.

However at the moment (relatively speaking) the cosmea consists of disparate back-holes that have been left with no possibility of being in a state of true universal interconnectivity at all levels. Note: Cosmean interconnectivity is a likely postulation but via the eos. Because of the original event it is logical to entertain the possibility that black holes themselves could break up into smaller back holes but under high odds of improbability.

*No matter how much time is allowed such a thing is inconceivable to my mind because the cosmea would then have to finally be filled in. Such a comprehension of states requires that the cosmea consists of a more expansive framework than the universe and the idea of an expanding rather than a contracting universe disallows such a notion in any case. Note: To avoid a possible logical contradiction which may be noticed, I will allow that perhaps the whole cosmea was fully engaged in becoming the universe and that 'pure' cosmea per se may never exist again. This will allow for the lowest temperatures expected to exist in black holes, to be a few degrees above zero k, forever! ---but not the empty space of the hyper verse which would always be expected to be at zero k.

This then presupposes that the universe is headed for final extinction inside of black holes. However from where I stand that isn't guaranteed at all.


Fortunately for our own existence, most atoms being the dumb 'animals' that they are, have undertaken to attempt the former course because the only recourse to an atom -without sufficient 'positive divergence' external energy input- is to attempt to shed energy (by legal subservience to the eos) in any way possible. This leads to the observance of the fact that atoms give each other energy and attempt to at the very least, to arrive at a state of relative equilibrium with their surrounds according to zeroeth law (parity actions). Far from being 'kind and sharing' they are attempting to rid themselves of this horrible thing called temperature being any degree at all above zero k. This indicates that the laws of thermodynamics are derived from cosmean laws. (I admit to a necessary digression. This subject (entropy) will be treated at length in a later chapter).

The attempt of atoms to return to the cosmea via a continuous but conditional stream of energy over the 'tines' (or as BBR) resulted in another unforeseen effect which caused the whole process to slow. This also caused the progress of the universe towards an equilibrium that's just the first of many 'goldilocks' states that allowed the rise and sustenance of biological life.

What happened is that the super massive streams of photons collided with each other, and although photons have no G-mass because they are partially causative of such mass, (the theorized reason will be soon tabled) they are still matter, and by default subject to the first law of the chronos. Note: A reasonable phenomenology with regard to their relationship with gravity will be addressed in a later chapter.

It may be stated at this juncture that light does have an attraction to massive bodies and AMO's in general, but this is not by gravity emanating from the body as traditionally thought because photons (bosons) are not subject to the laws of motion because they have no N-mass and that's the very reason why light doesn't exhibit any rate of acc-deceleration in a gravitational field and curvature by gravity would be an acceleration event.

It is a precept of G-theory that when photons collide, (especially head on) they lose some insignificant energy and proportional vibrational velocity (not frequency just amplitude and an infinitesimal graviton-flux-density proportional linear velocity change) and they incur a non specific (but momentary and recoverable) dimensional shift. How this is theorized to occur is that when the photons come into entanglement one or both of the photons instantaneously switches dimensions in avoidance. The photon instantly, and without spatial motion disturbance, crosses the brane and moves into the gravitos*. In so doing it emits a particle/s called a graviton. The graviton is subject to the laws of the gravitos and is emitted at almost infinite speed. (Some scientists have speculated at least ten to the tenth times 'c' in certain circumstances).

*This will be a nice headache for eigenspace dimensional calculations. The individual gravitons don't get very far before they collide with another graviton or photon. It is the eigenvector resultants of an innumerable quantity if interacting gravitons which is propagated. This doesn't have to be calculable it is automatically achieved under universal law.

What needs to be clearly understood is that GRAVITONS DON'T BOUNCE OFF OBJECTS AND BODIES IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. THEY ACT AT THE LEVEL OF THE QUARK LATTICE BY BOTH  DIRECT AND PERTURBATIVE FORCE AFFECTS WITH THE NECESSARY ENERGY CONSERVATION by way of gravitons losing velocity and or sub-sub-particles to nucleons. So they lose kinetic and particle matter energy. There is a motive force applied to -and also a rise in thermal energy within- the atom. Hey look the sun and stars are shining. The force of gravity seems to be weak but it is extremely strong. It's appearance of weakness is caused because of the slight differential force vector resultant that we personally notice as gravity. Don't go anywhere near that black hole though!


During the creation event; in considering the original massive and almost infinite quantity of photons that must have been colliding at almost infinite speeds, it stands to reason that a vast flux of gravitons was also emitted. According to both the laws of the gravitos and time, these gravitons found that when they consequently collided they lost very little energy and velocity when colliding with each other. This mechanics may actually be by an almost perfectly elastic rebound collision phenomenology*. In mentioning this I urge you to resist the notion that a similar thing occurs when gravitons collide with (transit) atoms TBE.

*This still means that any grab sample in space would show the same GD as though they had actually transited each other.


So now we have photon-absorbed and re-emitted gravitons which were at first attempting to head for the cosmea in all directions but they are now being forced to move around in universal space and have been slowed down by an infinitesimal amount. But we must consider a slowing all the same to meet the requirements of the third law of TD. The amount of slowing caused by transitioning through bodies can be surmised by the amount of time it takes solar gravitational anomalous effects to reach earth before the visible effects arrive, this being apparent at about ten to the tenth or at least ten to the eighth times 'c'; (being somewhat less than instantaneous over a distance of about eight light minutes). This is significantly slower than the theoretical absolute upper limit of graviton speed that's close to instantaneous. In support of this it has been shown by calculations in this thesis that graviton velocities approaching the other side of the earth and the sun may be at close to GD speeds of 1e27 times 'c'. This means that their speed becomes slowed by seventeen orders of magnitude by the matter density of the sun and its coronal halo and that corresponds to an enormous loss of energy and comparative force*. Note: This graviton transitional slowing is by power law with density, so any linear calculations engaged in, to attempt to arrive at the density of the sun compared with a black hole may be futile: TBE.

*Have a think aabout fusion and the massive gravitational force of stars.


Now these gravitons constituted a 'cloud' of unfathomable density (but not infinite) and were soon traveling with varying speeds, and by this reason they at first formed a vector resultant multi-nodal agglomerate of invisible and massless space energy/matter*, which over time became stable in the mean across the universe.

*Is anyone out there looking for dark matter/energy? It could be called by another name--- gravity!


What happens next in subjective analysis is that the gravitons collided with atoms and specifically nucleons which are theorized to have parts of an atom that exist in dimensions which allows the passage of gravitons through them but with a slight but mutual perturbative affect with nucleons specifically; and this will all be examined in depth. The idea of the phenomenon of nuclear transition capability with necessary mutual force and/or speed reduction (as well as the relatively inversely proportional energy conservation required force on objects and bodies) was definitely the result. If I didn't make that clear enough; eventually if a graviton passes perturbativly -by dimensional cross brane separation- through enough nucleons it will slow down to zero velocity and be finally captured by one while the nucleons wouldn't be slowed by much at all but the energy statistics would be the same for both and F=ma still stands for the nucleons but not the gravitons because they operate via a different statistics TBE. NB: It is however of extreme importance for the G-theory of push gravity that the gravitons also have a perturbative affect on atoms which results in heating affects and G-mass resulting in realizable gravity or other motion by nuclear perturbation, and this by causing inertial or motive force: TBE.

Unfortunately for the atom trying to return to zero k the energy involved is either (but not exclusively) converted to spatial motion, or absorbed and re-emitted as BBR or returned to the proton as a quantum value energy change, and the involved proton gains a rise in universal temperature and so regains more energy to emit; which it will do so instantaneously by re-emitting the transitioning gravitons in forms typified by BBR and/or conditionally delayed by PEP/QIP derived photon quantum packets. If a proton receives a photon via the photos it will instantaneously re-emit it provisional with its 'energy charge' being full, again in subservience to QIP/PEP*. Note: It is probable that gravitons in the first instance streamed throughout the universe by BBR from destroyed/decayed neutrons and hence gravity in a weaker form was already at work immediately -but not instantly- after creation. It is theorized that gravitons are indeed dark matter but not when falsely interpreted as the static dark matter (currently theorized) whereby it is this dark matter which is erroneously thought to be the static cause of gravity by some unknown phenomenology (magic). However by G-theory gravitons do not have any realistic attractive or repulsive force effects on either themselves or other objects and cannot therefore be used 'en static masse' to solve the galaxy rotation problem, a reasonable solution for which I will be providing in a later chapter.

*High energy affects on nucleons by high energy photons will be addressed further on.


This begs the question regarding graviton transitional gravitation phenomenology for more massive objects. Answer. Stars received so much energy via graviton friction transitional speed loss that in turn this generated sufficient internal heat to enable fusion to occur at lower temperatures under the conditions of the intense gravity of the creation event*, and they began to 'shine' as their clouds of atoms were compressed violently inwards and under the increase in thermal energy caused by the graviton transitions and we had the commencement of fusion. This shining may well have been in the red and infrared end of the spectrum at first. Note: It is with valid doubts I postulate that some black holes could have been formed by clouds of atoms which became so dense and massive that gravitons were completely captured. With all their energy being expended within that particlular body of matter -which then heated the huge body up to the BST and combined with the massive inertial force of the transitions being now realizable as a massive gravity- this all enabled its atoms to recombine into praetoms and return to a cosmean like state.

For reasons to be forthcoming I will affirm that I consider black holes to actually be remnants of the cosmea that exist within the universe. I have a logical dilemma to present pertaining to the traditional idea of black hole singularity formation as well as sustenance, since such an unlikely event has already been postulated in popular scientific mythology with undue acceptance as fact. It's more likely that the body envisaged above would have super-hypernived (---hypernoved?) long before it could ever have become a black hole.

*Cationic/Nuclear pressure phenomenology is to be analyzed.


Many of the supernovas and historical events that we are witnessing today in the distant universe may very well be the foregone birth throes of the emerging cosmo-universe, albeit now being witnessed in skew time.

Now having expressed doubts about the factual existence of singularities it still remains that the idea of highly compressed matter states within the universe proper cannot be rejected. The matter space disparity is so great that fully ionized nucleons should be able to be fused together and compressed to incredibly small states by extreme gravity. Paradoxically by the action of a similar graviton depletion phenomenology, this can conversely result in a relative gravity vacuum somewhere within the bounds of a giant star. This phenomenon could -without warning- cause the reduction of the internal stellar pressure which -under conditions which will be explained- then results in a hyper nova and this is the most likely result rather than the creation of a black hole in lieu of such an explosion. Note: Another even more plausible but closely related mechanics of supernova formation will be theorized because such a phenomenon has a -proposed and novel- physical causation.

If nucleosynthesis is considered to be even a possible method of creation for large masses of the heavier elements, it is likely that it was within the bowels of early universal hyper-novas that atoms larger than iron 60 were formed, and the gamma ray bursts from the incredible number of original super/hyper-novas would have helped maintain (for probably some minutes), the massive gravity at first realized and required. This may be a novel theory for hyper-novas but I will be presenting a completely different phenomenology for supernovas.

Clue: We must assume that fusion in stars occurs with fully ionized nuclei because otherwise when oxygen fuses to form carbon there would necessarily be a very large 'fire' resulting in the formation of carbon oxides. This result would normally be suppressed by the highly compressed ionic state of the nuclei. If full ionization of the matter deep within stars is not the case or if more electrons can get in there then all bets are off for any calculations regarding the life of our sun TBE.

The obvious massive density of matter in many places in the universe only has situational relevance under a sufficient graviton assault.

The 'mass' of stars is likely to be greater than expected because graviton effects are conditionally proportional according to nucleon density per unit volume and not nuclide density per se. -There is a difference- As well as that stars are considered to back-fill their own gravity to some extent by their own coronal light emissions. The actual extent may be calculable by investigation of the Mercury problem and the Alias effect: TBE.

It is an enigma of science that fission releases a vast amount of energy and the fact that the reverse case of fusion also releases a large amount. This could possibly be explained at this point by the idea that the fission energy was potential energy and that the fusion energy comes from divergent graviton or externally applied energy. This would be seen as only a simplistic argument for the moment so other more empirically sound reasons will be forthcoming.


For the follow on subject of 'praetoms to atoms' ctrl click here or refer to ch 16.